CVE-2024-3661: DHCP routing options can manipulate interface-based VPN traffic
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 90.7% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: NetworkManager (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10; NetworkManager-adsl (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10; NetworkManager-bluetooth (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to NetworkManager (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10; NetworkManager-adsl (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10; NetworkManager-bluetooth (AlmaLinux:8) 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.
- Published
- May 6, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.0% · 90th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-306
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.6
- CNA · cisa-cg
- 7.6
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fortinet | forticlient | cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient |
| cisco | anyconnect vpn client | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:anyconnect_vpn_client |
| cisco | secure client | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_client |
| paloaltonetworks | globalprotect | cpe:2.3:a:paloaltonetworks:globalprotect |
| citrix | secure access client | cpe:2.3:a:citrix:secure_access_client |
| apple | iphone os | cpe:2.3:o:apple:iphone_os |
| apple | macos | cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos |
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
| f5 | big-ip access policy manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager |
| watchguard | ipsec mobile vpn client | cpe:2.3:a:watchguard:ipsec_mobile_vpn_client |
| watchguard | mobile vpn with ssl | cpe:2.3:a:watchguard:mobile_vpn_with_ssl |
| zscaler | client connector | cpe:2.3:a:zscaler:client_connector |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco secure clientall versions
- paloaltonetworks globalprotectall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisa-cg). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IETF DHCP
- 0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-adsl | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-bluetooth | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-cloud-setup | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-config-connectivity-redhat | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-config-server | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-initscripts-updown | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-libnm | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-libnm-devel | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-ovs | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-ppp | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-team | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-tui | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-wifi | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | NetworkManager-wwan | before 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-adsl | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-bluetooth | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-cloud-setup | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-config-connectivity-redhat | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-config-server | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | NetworkManager-initscripts-updown | before 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 | 1:1.48.10-5.el9_5 |
+94
Same product
fortinet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-17658An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiClient FortiTray component of FortiClientWindows v6.2.2 and prior allow an attacker to ga40Plan
- CVE-2017-14184An Information Disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 5.6.0 and below versions, FortiClient for Mac OSX 5.6.0 and belo36Monitor
- CVE-2016-8493In FortiClientWindows 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, an attacker may escalate privilege via a FortiClientNamedPipe vulnerability.36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-45590Apr 9, 2024 · An improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Fortinet FortiClientLinux version 7.2.0, 7.0.6 through 7.0.10 and 7.0.3 thro35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-31492Apr 10, 2024 · An external control of file name or path vulnerability [CWE-73] in FortiClientMac version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.10 and below install31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-45856Sep 10, 2024 · An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClientWindows 6.4 all versions, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, FortiClientMac 6.4 a23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:NetworkManager | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-adsl | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-bluetooth | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-cloud-setup | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-config-connectivity-redhat | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-config-server | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-initscripts-updown | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-libnm | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-libnm-devel | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-ovs | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:NetworkManager-ppp | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-adsl-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-bluetooth-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-cloud-setup | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-cloud-setup-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-debugsource | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-libnm-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-ovs-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-ppp-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-team-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-tui-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:NetworkManager-wifi-debuginfo | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:NetworkManager | 1:1.40.16-18.el8_10 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×3
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2025-05-16 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2025-05-23 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2025-11-27 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+374 d
- TodayNov 7, 2026+915 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2024-3149226 days apartAn external control of file name or path vulnerability [CWE-73] in FortiClientMac version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.10 and below install31Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-306 · Missing Authentication for Critical FunctionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
nvd-primary
Root cause
A function added for development or support ships to production without authentication. It often relies on the assumption that it is “only reachable from the internal network.”
The bug in code
The whole CWE-306 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
// Added for the support team
app.post("/maintenance/reset", resetDevice);Fixed
if (config.maintenanceEnabled) {
app.post(
"/maintenance/reset",
requireSession, requireRole("admin"), resetDevice
);
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (14 more)Show less
- datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2131#section-7
- datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3442#section-7
- fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-170
- issuetracker.google.com/issues/263721377
- lowendtalk.com/discussion/188857/a-rogue-dhcp-server-within-your-network-can-and-will-hijack-your-vpn-traffic
- mullvad.net/en/blog/evaluating-the-impact-of-tunnelvision
- my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000139553
- news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40279632
- news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40284111
- security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-3661
- support.citrix.com/article/CTX677069/cloud-software-group-security-advisory-for-cve20243661
- www.agwa.name/blog/post/hardening_openvpn_for_def_con
- www.leviathansecurity.com/research/tunnelvision
- www.watchguard.com/wgrd-psirt/advisory/wgsa-2024-00009
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.