CVE-2024-35315: A vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI)…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.77% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 55.9% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI) 1.0.0.25, could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a privilege escalation attack due to improper file validation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to run arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
- Published
- Oct 21, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 55th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| mitel | micollab | cpe:2.3:a:mitel:micollab |
| mitel | mivoice business solution virtual instance | cpe:2.3:a:mitel:mivoice_business_solution_virtual_instance |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- mitel micollabup to 9.7.1.110 inclusive
- mitel mivoice business solution virtual instance1.0.0.25
Same product
mitel: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-41713A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an…KEV95Now
- CVE-2022-26143The TP-240 (aka tp240dvr) component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.4 SP1 FP1 and MiVoice Business Express through 8.1 allows remote attackers…KEV95Now
- CVE-2024-35286A vulnerability in NuPoint Messenger (NPM) of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8.0.33 allows an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a SQL injection…59Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-35287Oct 21, 2024 · A vulnerability in the NuPoint Messenger (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through version 9.8 SP1 (9.8.1.5) could allow an authenticated…26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-35314Oct 21, 2024 · A vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI)…40Plan
- Later →CVE-2024-41712Oct 21, 2024 · A vulnerability in the Web Conferencing Component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8.1.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a…26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2024-06-03 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-141 d
- Published
- TodayNov 11, 2026+751 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-353140 days apartA vulnerability in the Desktop Client of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110, and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI)…40Plan
- CVE-2024-417140 days apartA vulnerability in the Web Interface component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 (9.8.1.5) and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance…35Monitor
- CVE-2024-417120 days apartA vulnerability in the Web Conferencing Component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8.1.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a…26Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2024-479120 days apartA vulnerability in the AWV (Audio, Web, and Video) Conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could allow an…32Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-1746 · Oct 22, 2024(Mitel Çoklu Ürün Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.