NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

CVE-2024-30604: Tenda FH1203 v2.0.1.6 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the list1 parameter of the fromDhcpListClient function.

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.74% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 54.5% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

BDU:2024-02439

Published: Mar 28, 2024
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 0.7% · 54th percentile
CWE: CWE-125

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: proof of concept
Automatable: yes
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
tenda	fh1203 firmware	cpe:2.3:o:tenda:fh1203_firmware
tenda	fh1203	cpe:2.3:h:tenda:fh1203

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

tenda fh1203 firmware2.0.1.6

Same product

tenda: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2024-30602Tenda FH1203 v2.0.1.6 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the schedStartTime parameter of the setSchedWifi function.
39Monitor
CVE-2023-38940Tenda F1203 V2.0.1.6, FH1203 V2.0.1.6 and FH1205 V2.0.0.7(775) were discovered to contain a stack overflow via the ssid parameter in the for
39Monitor
CVE-2023-38934Tenda F1203 V2.0.1.6, FH1203 V2.0.1.6 and FH1205 V2.0.0.7(775) was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the deviceId parameter in the
39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2024-30601Mar 28, 2024 · Tenda FH1203 v2.0.1.6 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the time parameter of the saveParentControlInfo function.
32Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2024-30603Mar 28, 2024 · Tenda FH1203 v2.0.1.6 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the urls parameter of the saveParentControlInfo function.
26Monitor
Later →CVE-2024-32283Apr 17, 2024 · Tenda FH1203 V2.0.1.6 firmware has a command injection vulnerablility in formexeCommand function via the cmdinput parameter.
29Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).