CVE-2024-28830: Automation user secrets written to audit log
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 10/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.33% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Checkmk GmbH Checkmk 2.1.0p45, 2.2.0p28, 2.3.0p7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Checkmk GmbH Checkmk 2.1.0p45, 2.2.0p28, 2.3.0p7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File in Checkmk GmbH's Checkmk versions <2.3.0p7, <2.2.0p28, <2.1.0p45 and <=2.0.0p39 (EOL) causes automation user secrets to be written to audit log files accessible to administrators.
- Published
- Jun 26, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 27th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-532
Report tools
Action score
10
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 10 / 40 · 2.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 2.7
- CNA · Checkmk
- 2.7
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| checkmk | checkmk | cpe:2.3:a:checkmk:checkmk |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- checkmk checkmkup to 2.0.0 inclusive
- checkmk checkmk2.1.0
- checkmk checkmk2.2.0
- checkmk checkmk2.3.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Checkmk). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Checkmk GmbH Checkmk
- 2.3.0 and later · before 2.3.0p7affected · semver
- 2.2.0 and later · before 2.2.0p28affected · semver
- 2.1.0 and later · before 2.1.0p45affected · semver
- 2.0.0 and later · up to and including 2.0.0p39affected · semver
Same product
checkmk: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-28825Brute-force protection ineffective for some login methods39Monitor
- CVE-2022-48317Insecure Termination of RestAPI Session Tokens39Monitor
- CVE-2025-39666omd: Local privilege escalation when executing omd commands as root37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-28831Jun 25, 2024 · XSS in confirmation pop-up21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-28832Jun 25, 2024 · XSS in Crash Report Page19Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-38857Jul 2, 2024 · Reflected links in visuals facilitate phishing attacks24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Checkmk GmbH Checkmk | 2.1.0p45 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Checkmk GmbH Checkmk | 2.2.0p28 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Checkmk GmbH Checkmk | 2.3.0p7 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-2092300 days apartRemote site authentication secrets written to web log28Monitor
- CVE-2024-47094156 days apartLogging of sitesecret to automations log22Monitor
- CVE-2025-1075238 days apartLDAP credentials logged to Apache error log22Monitor
- CVE-2023-31207421 days apartAutomation user secret logged to Apache access log22Monitor
- CVE-2024-38862110 days apartSNMP and IMPI secrets written to audit log20Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log FileCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.