CVE-2024-27144: Pre-authenticated Remote Code Execution
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 69.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The Toshiba printers provide several ways to upload files using the web interface without authentication. An attacker can overwrite any insecure files. And the Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. The programs can be replaced by malicious programs by any local or remote attacker. This vulnerability can be executed in combination with other vulnerabilities and difficult to execute alone. So, the CVSS score for this vulnerability alone is lower than the score listed in the "Base Score" of this vulnerability. For detail on related other vulnerabilities, please ask to the below contact point. https://www.toshibatec.com/contacts/products/ As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL.
- Published
- Jun 13, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
39
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Toshiba
- 9.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| toshibatec | e-studio-2521 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-2521_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-2020 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-2020_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-2520 nc | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-2520_nc |
| toshibatec | e-studio-2021 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-2021_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-2525 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-2525_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-3025 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-3025_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-3525 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-3525_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-3525 acg | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-3525_acg |
| toshibatec | e-studio-4525 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-4525_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-5525 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-5525_ac |
| toshibatec | e-studio-5525 acg | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-5525_acg |
| toshibatec | e-studio-6525 ac | cpe:2.3:h:toshibatec:e-studio-6525_ac |
and 38 more
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Toshiba). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Toshiba Tec Corporation Toshiba Tec e-Studio multi-function peripheral (MFP)
- see the reference URLaffected
Same product
toshiba tec corporation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-27172Remote Code Execution47Plan
- CVE-2024-27173Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution by overwriting existing Python files containing executable code.40Plan
- CVE-2024-27174Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-27142Jun 13, 2024 · Pre-authenticated XXE injection23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-27143Jun 13, 2024 · Pre-authenticated Remote Code Execution39Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-27145Jun 13, 2024 · Multiple Post-authenticated Remote Code Execution39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-271731 days apartRemote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution by overwriting existing Python files containing executable code.40Plan
- CVE-2024-271450 days apartMultiple Post-authenticated Remote Code Execution39Monitor
- CVE-2024-271741 days apartRemote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution.39Monitor
- CVE-2024-271761 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
- CVE-2024-271771 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
- CVE-2024-271781 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2024-271761 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
- CVE-2024-271771 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
- CVE-2024-271781 days apartRemote Code Execution28Monitor
- CVE-2024-271751 days apartLocal File Inclusion17Monitor
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-0709 · Jun 14, 2024(Toshiba Yazıcıları Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.