CVE-2024-27082: Cacti Cross-site Scripting vulnerability when managing trees
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.92% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: cacti (Debian:12) 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u5; cacti (Debian:13) 1.2.27+ds1-1; cacti (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 7.6, NVD 5.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to cacti (Debian:12) 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u5; cacti (Debian:13) 1.2.27+ds1-1; cacti (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Cacti provides an operational monitoring and fault management framework. Versions of Cacti prior to 1.2.27 are vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting, a type of cross-site scripting where malicious scripts are permanently stored on a target server and served to users who access a particular page. Version 1.2.27 contains a patch for the issue.
- Published
- May 14, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 60th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-79
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.4
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.6
- 2.2 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cacti | cacti | cpe:2.3:a:cacti:cacti |
Limit the impact of XSS
This is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A well-configured Content-Security-Policy doesn't fix it, but greatly reduces its impact. Check your site's CSP and other security headers for free.
Check security headersAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cacti cactibefore 1.2.27
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cacti cacti
- < 1.2.27affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | cacti | before 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u5 | 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u5 |
| Debian:13 | cacti | before 1.2.27+ds1-1 | 1.2.27+ds1-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | cacti | before 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | cacti | before 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 | 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 | 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | cacti | before 1.2.27-1.1 | 1.2.27-1.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | cacti | before 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP6 | cacti | before 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 | 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP6 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 | 1.2.27-bp156.2.3.1 |
Same product
cacti: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-46169Unauthenticated Command InjectionKEV99Now
- CVE-2024-29895Cacti command injection in cmd_realtime.php70This week
- CVE-2023-39361Unauthenticated SQL Injection in graph_view.php in Cacti66This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-51448Dec 22, 2023 · SQL Injection vulnerability when managing SNMP Notification Receivers55Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-25641May 14, 2024 · Cacti RCE vulnerability when importing packages54Plan
- Later →CVE-2024-29894May 14, 2024 · Cacti Cross-site Scripting vulnerability when using JavaScript based messaging API18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:cacti | 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u5 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cacti | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cacti-spine | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cacti | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cacti-spine | 1.2.27-bp155.2.9.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-43364146 days apartStored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) when creating external links in Cacti43Plan
- CVE-2024-43365146 days apartStored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) when creating external links in Cacti40Plan
- CVE-2024-43362146 days apartStored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) when creating external links in Cacti33Monitor
- CVE-2024-314440 days apartCacti XSS vulnerability in lib/html.php by reading dirty data stored in database25Monitor
- CVE-2024-302680 days apartCacti XSS vulnerability in display_settings24Monitor
- CVE-2023-50250144 days apartCross-Site Scripting vulnerability when Import xml template file24Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-79 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;Fixed
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →