NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

CVE-2024-24325: TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the…

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 77.8% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the setParentalRules function.

Published: Jan 30, 2024
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 1.7% · 77th percentile
CWE: CWE-78

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS: 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 1 / 30 · 1.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: proof of concept
Automatable: yes
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
totolink	a3300r firmware	cpe:2.3:o:totolink:a3300r_firmware
totolink	a3300r	cpe:2.3:h:totolink:a3300r

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

totolink a3300r firmware17.0.0cu.557_b20221024

Same product

totolink: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2025-52046Totolink A3300R V17.0.0cu.596_B20250515 was found to contain a command injection vulnerability in the sub_4197C0 function via the mac and…
41Plan
CVE-2024-24329TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the…
41Plan
CVE-2024-24328TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the…
41Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2024-23060Jan 11, 2024 · TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the ip parameter in the setDmzCfg…
40Plan
← EarlierCVE-2024-23061Jan 11, 2024 · TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the minute parameter in the…
40Plan
Later →CVE-2024-24326Jan 30, 2024 · TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the arpEnable parameter in the…
39Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

CVE-2024-243280 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the…
41Plan
CVE-2024-243290 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the enable parameter in the…
41Plan
CVE-2024-243320 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the url parameter in the…
40Plan
CVE-2024-243330 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the desc parameter in the…
40Plan
CVE-2024-2305919 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the username parameter in the…
40Plan
CVE-2024-2306019 days apartTOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the ip parameter in the setDmzCfg…
40Plan

Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
No account or password is required.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: high · the service can be disrupted

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: None
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: High
Availability impact: High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-78 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1const host = req.body.host;
2exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

Fixed

1const host = req.body.host;
2if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
3execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log (0)

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

All records