CVE-2024-23109: An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests.
- Published
- Feb 5, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.2% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
40
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · fortinet
- 9.7
- 0.1 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:X/RC:X
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fortinet | fortisiem | cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisiem |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (fortinet). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Fortinet FortiSIEM
- 7.1.1affected
- 7.0.0 and later · up to and including 7.0.2affected · semver
- 6.7.0 and later · up to and including 6.7.8affected · semver
- 6.6.0 and later · up to and including 6.6.3affected · semver
- 6.5.0 and later · up to and including 6.5.2affected · semver
- 6.4.0 and later · up to and including 6.4.3affected · semver
Affected versions · NVD (7)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fortinet fortisiem6.4.0 and later · up to 6.4.2 inclusive
- fortinet fortisiem6.5.0 and later · up to 6.5.2 inclusive
- fortinet fortisiem6.6.0 and later · up to 6.6.3 inclusive
- fortinet fortisiem6.7.0 and later · up to 6.7.8 inclusive
- fortinet fortisiem7.0.0 and later · up to 7.0.2 inclusive
- fortinet fortisiem7.1.0
- fortinet fortisiem7.1.1
Same product
fortinet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-34992A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to…64This week
- CVE-2024-23108An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to…63This week
- CVE-2025-25256An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in…58Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-41676Nov 14, 2023 · An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor [CWE-200] in FortiSIEM version 7.0.0 and before 6.7.5 may allow an attacker…26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-45585Nov 14, 2023 · An insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerability [CWE-532] in FortiSIEM version 7.0.0, version 6.7.6 and below, version 6.13Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-46667Jan 14, 2025 · A allocation of resources without limits or throttling in Fortinet FortiSIEM 5.3 all versions, 5.4 all versions, 6.x all versions, 7.0 all…30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-34992118 days apartA improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to…64This week
- CVE-2024-231080 days apartAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to…63This week
- CVE-2023-3655383 days apartA improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiSIEM version 5.4.0 and 5.3.0…40Plan
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-0093 · Feb 8, 2024(Fortinet Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.