CVE-2024-22395: Improper access control vulnerability has been identified in the SMA100 SSL-VPN virtual office portal, which in specific conditions could…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.43% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper access control vulnerability has been identified in the SMA100 SSL-VPN virtual office portal, which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker to associate another user's MFA mobile application.
- Published
- Feb 23, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 37th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
25
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.3
- CNA · sonicwall
- 6.3
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| sonicwall | sma 200 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sma_200_firmware |
| sonicwall | sma 200 | cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:sma_200 |
| sonicwall | sma 210 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sma_210_firmware |
| sonicwall | sma 210 | cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:sma_210 |
| sonicwall | sma 400 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sma_400_firmware |
| sonicwall | sma 400 | cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:sma_400 |
| sonicwall | sma 410 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sma_410_firmware |
| sonicwall | sma 410 | cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:sma_410 |
| sonicwall | sma 500v firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sonicwall:sma_500v_firmware |
| sonicwall | sma 500v | cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:sma_500v |
Using sma 200 firmware? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (VPN gateway)
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (sonicwall). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
SonicWall SMA100
- 10.2.1.10-62sv and earlier versionsaffected
Affected versions · NVD (5)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- sonicwall sma 200 firmwarebefore 10.2.1.11-65sv
- sonicwall sma 210 firmwarebefore 10.2.1.11-65sv
- sonicwall sma 400 firmwarebefore 10.2.1.11-65sv
- sonicwall sma 410 firmwarebefore 10.2.1.11-65sv
- sonicwall sma 500v firmwarebefore 10.2.1.11-65sv
Same product
sonicwall: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-20038A Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in SMA100 Apache httpd server's mod_cgi module environment variables allows a remote…KEV99Now
- CVE-2023-44221Improper neutralization of special elements in the SMA100 SSL-VPN management interface allows a remote authenticated attacker with…KEV81Now
- CVE-2021-20034An improper access control vulnerability in SMA100 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the path traversal checks and delete…61This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-2915Aug 26, 2022 · A Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the SonicWall SMA100 appliance allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause Denial of…37Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-5970Dec 5, 2023 · Improper authentication in the SMA100 SSL-VPN virtual office portal allows a remote authenticated attacker to create an identical external…35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-40763Dec 5, 2024 · Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicWall SMA100 SSLVPN due to the use of strcpy.30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-597080 days apartImproper authentication in the SMA100 SSL-VPN virtual office portal allows a remote authenticated attacker to create an identical external…35Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2023-4422180 days apartImproper neutralization of special elements in the SMA100 SSL-VPN management interface allows a remote authenticated attacker with…KEV81Now
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
nvd-primary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middleware
app.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();
admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);
app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.