CVE-2024-21982: CVE-2024-21982 Information Disclosure Vulnerability in ONTAP 9
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.37% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: NetApp ONTAP 9 9.10.1P16, 9.11.1P13, 9.12.1P8.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to NetApp ONTAP 9 9.10.1P16, 9.11.1P13, 9.12.1P8 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
ONTAP versions 9.4 and higher are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to disclosure of sensitive information to unprivileged attackers when the object-store profiler command is being run by an administrative user.
- Published
- Jan 11, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 31th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · netapp
- 4.8
- 1.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netapp | clustered data ontap | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:clustered_data_ontap |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netapp clustered data ontap9.4 and later · before 9.8
- netapp clustered data ontap9.10.1
- netapp clustered data ontap9.11.1
- netapp clustered data ontap9.12.1
- netapp clustered data ontap9.13.1
- netapp clustered data ontap9.8
- netapp clustered data ontap9.9.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (netapp). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NetApp ONTAP 9
- 9.4 and later · before 9.8P21affected · patch
- 9.9.1 and later · before 9.9.1P18affected · patch
- 9.10.1 and later · before 9.10.1P16affected · patch
- 9.11.1 and later · before 9.11.1P13affected · patch
- 9.12.1 and later · before 9.12.1P8affected · patch
- 9.13.1 and later · before 9.13.1P4affected · patch
Same product
netapp: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-12421NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on the storage controller via 36Monitor
- CVE-2017-12420Heap-based buffer overflow in the SMB implementation in NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P8 and 9.0 before P2 allows remote authentic36Monitor
- CVE-2018-5490Read-Only export policy rules are not correctly enforced in Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3 Release Candidate versions and therefore may allow more35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-23241Oct 19, 2022 · Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.11.1 through 9.11.1P2 with SnapLock configured FlexGroups are susceptible to a vulnerability which could all32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-27314Oct 12, 2023 · Denial of Service Vulnerability in ONTAP 930Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-21985Jan 26, 2024 · Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in ONTAP 930Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.10.1P16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.11.1P13 | Vendor (CNA) |
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.12.1P8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.13.1P4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.8P21 | Vendor (CNA) |
| NetApp ONTAP 9 | 9.9.1P18 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.