Moodle: auto-populated h5p author name causes a potential information leak
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.53% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: git.moodle.org moodle 3.11.17, 3.9.24, 4.0.11.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 3.3, NVD 5.3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to git.moodle.org moodle 3.11.17, 3.9.24, 4.0.11 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
H5P metadata automatically populated the author with the user's username, which could be sensitive information.
- Published
- Nov 9, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 44th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · fedora
- 3.3
- 2.0 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| moodle | moodle | cpe:2.3:a:moodle:moodle |
| fedoraproject | extra packages for enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:extra_packages_for_enterprise_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject extra packages for enterprise linux7.0
- fedoraproject fedora38
- moodle moodle4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.11
- moodle moodlebefore 3.9.24
- moodle moodle4.2.0 and later · before 4.2.3
- moodle moodle4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.6
- moodle moodle3.11.0 and later · before 3.11.17
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (fedora). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
git.moodle.org moodle
- 4.2.0 and later · before 4.2.3affected · semver
- 4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.6affected · semver
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.11affected · semver
- 3.11.0 and later · before 3.11.17affected · semver
- before 3.9.24affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | moodle/moodle | before 4.3.0-rc2 | 4.3.0-rc2 |
Same product
moodle: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-43425Moodle: remote code execution via calculated question types58Plan
- CVE-2021-36393In Moodle, an SQL injection risk was identified in the library fetching a user's recent courses.55Plan
- CVE-2022-0332A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.4.52Plan
- CVE-2022-35650The vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to input validation error when importing lesson questions.46Plan
- CVE-2018-1133An issue was discovered in Moodle 3.x.44Plan
- CVE-2021-21809A command execution vulnerability exists in the default legacy spellchecker plugin in Moodle 3.10.43Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| git.moodle.org moodle | 3.11.17 | Vendor (CNA) |
| git.moodle.org moodle | 3.9.24 | Vendor (CNA) |
| git.moodle.org moodle | 4.0.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| git.moodle.org moodle | 4.1.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| git.moodle.org moodle | 4.2.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Packagist:moodle/moodle | 4.3.0-rc2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-32044533 days apartMoodle: unauthenticated rest api user data exposure30Monitor
- CVE-2024-34002204 days apartmoodle: authenticated LFI risk in some misconfigured shared hosting environments via modified mod_feedback backup26Monitor
- CVE-2024-34004204 days apartmoodle: authenticated LFI risk in some misconfigured shared hosting environments via modified mod_wiki backup26Monitor
- CVE-2024-34005204 days apartmoodle: authenticated LFI risk in some misconfigured shared hosting environments via modified mod_data backup26Monitor
- CVE-2024-34003204 days apartmoodle: authenticated LFI risk in some misconfigured shared hosting environments via modified mod_workshop backup23Monitor
- CVE-2023-28336231 days apartMoodle: teacher can access names of users they do not have permission to access17Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{ "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"], "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }}Fixed
{ "permissions": ["activeTab"], "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.