CVE-2023-46426: Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in gpac version 2.3-DEV-rev588-g7edc40fee-master, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.89% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 59.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in gpac version 2.3-DEV-rev588-g7edc40fee-master, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and cause a denial of service (DoS) via gf_fwrite component in at utils/os_file.c.
- Published
- Mar 9, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 59th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-122
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gpac | gpac | cpe:2.3:a:gpac:gpac |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gpac gpac2.3-dev-rev588-g7edc40fee-master
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | gpac | from 0 | — |
Same product
gpac: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-28300NULL Pointer Dereference in the "isomedia/track.c" module's "MergeTrack()" function of GPAC v0.5.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary cod40Plan
- CVE-2018-13006An issue was discovered in MP4Box in GPAC 0.7.1.40Plan
- CVE-2018-13005An issue was discovered in MP4Box in GPAC 0.7.1.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-24266Feb 5, 2024 · gpac v2.2.1 was discovered to contain a Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability via the dasher_configure_pid function at /src/filters/dasher.c.30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-24267Feb 5, 2024 · gpac v2.2.1 (fixed in v2.4.0) was discovered to contain a memory leak via the gfio_blob variable in the gf_fileio_from_blob function.30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-46427Mar 9, 2024 · An issue was discovered in gpac version 2.3-DEV-rev588-g7edc40fee-master, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial 39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-0841388 days apartGPAC reframe_mp3.c mp3_dmx_process heap-based overflow35Monitor
- CVE-2023-1655348 days apartHeap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac31Monitor
- CVE-2023-1448358 days apartGPAC mpegts.c gf_m2ts_process_sdt heap-based overflow31Monitor
- CVE-2023-0866387 days apartHeap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac31Monitor
- CVE-2023-0819390 days apartHeap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac31Monitor
- CVE-2023-0760394 days apartHeap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac31Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.