CVE-2023-41053: Redis SORT_RO may bypass ACL configuration
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 13/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.29% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: redis (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635; redis-devel (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635; redis-doc (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to redis (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635; redis-devel (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635; redis-doc (AlmaLinux:9) 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. Redis does not correctly identify keys accessed by `SORT_RO` and as a result may grant users executing this command access to keys that are not explicitly authorized by the ACL configuration. The problem exists in Redis 7.0 or newer and has been fixed in Redis 7.0.13 and 7.2.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
- Published
- Sep 6, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 21th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-269
Report tools
Action score
13
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 13 / 40 · 3.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 3.3
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 3.3
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is Redis on your server exposed to the internet?Run a port scan
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redis | redis | cpe:2.3:a:redis:redis |
Using redis? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Redis)
Is Redis on your server exposed to the internet?
The free port scanner finds the open ports on your server and matches the service versions it can read against known vulnerabilities. No account needed.
Run a port scanVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
redis redis
- >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.13, >= 7.1.0, < 7.2.1affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redis redis7.0 and later · before 7.0.13
- redis redis7.2.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | redis | before 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | redis-devel | before 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | redis-doc | before 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 |
| Alpine:v3.16 | redis | from 7.0 · before 7.0.13-r0 | 7.0.13-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.19 | redis | from 7.0 · before 7.2.1-r0 | 7.2.1-r0 |
| Debian:12 | redis | before 5:7.0.15-1~deb12u1 | 5:7.0.15-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | redis | before 5:7.0.13-1 | 5:7.0.13-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | redis7 | before 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 | 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | redis | before 7.2.2-1.1 | 7.2.2-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | redis | before 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | redis-debuginfo | before 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | redis-debugsource | before 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | redis-devel | before 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | redis-doc | before 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | redis7 | before 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 | 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 |
Same product
redis: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-0543It was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox…KEV100Now
- CVE-2025-49844Redis Lua Use-After-Free may lead to remote code execution64This week
- CVE-2023-36824Heap overflow in COMMAND GETKEYS and ACL evaluation in Redis58Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-24834Jul 13, 2023 · Heap overflow issue with the Lua cjson library used by Redis47Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-31294Jul 15, 2023 · Redis before 6cbea7d allows a replica to cause an assertion failure in a primary server by sending a non-administrative command…23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-45145Oct 18, 2023 · Redis Unix-domain socket may have be exposed with the wrong permissions for a short time window.14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:redis | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:redis-devel | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:redis-doc | 7.2.6-1.module_el9.5.0+130+36ae7635 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:redis | 7.0.13-r0 · Alpine:v3.16 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:redis | 5:7.0.15-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:redis | 7.2.2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:redis7 | 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:redis | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:redis-debuginfo | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:redis-debugsource | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:redis-devel | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:redis-doc | 0:7.2.6-1.module+el9.5.0+22422+63e067d8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:redis7 | 7.0.8-150500.3.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
To simplify setup, a service account is granted broad, cluster-wide permissions. The principle of least privilege is skipped during installation.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-269 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
kind: ClusterRole
rules:
- apiGroups: ["*"]
resources: ["*"]
verbs: ["*"]Fixed
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: lodos-system
rules:
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
resources: ["deployments"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "update"]Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
- github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-q4jr-5p56-4xwc
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OLBPIUUD273UGRN2WAYHPVUAULY36QVL/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UA4MSJ623BH6HP5UHSJD2FOTN3QM5DQS/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YLYNYT52EHR63E7L7SHRTHEPUMAFFDLX/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.