CVE-2023-39359: Authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in graphs.php in Cacti
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 81.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Cacti cacti 1.2.25.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Cacti cacti 1.2.25 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Cacti is an open source operational monitoring and fault management framework. An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability was discovered which allows authenticated users to perform privilege escalation and remote code execution. The vulnerability resides in the `graphs.php` file. When dealing with the cases of ajax_hosts and ajax_hosts_noany, if the `site_id` parameter is greater than 0, it is directly reflected in the WHERE clause of the SQL statement. This creates an SQL injection vulnerability. This issue has been addressed in version 1.2.25. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
- Published
- Sep 5, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.0% · 81th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-89
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 8.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cacti | cacti | cpe:2.3:a:cacti:cacti |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cacti cactibefore 1.2.25
- fedoraproject fedora37
- fedoraproject fedora38
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cacti cacti
- < 1.2.25affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | cacti | before 1.2.16+ds1-2+deb11u2 | 1.2.16+ds1-2+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | cacti | before 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u1 | 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | cacti | before 1.2.25+ds1-1 | 1.2.25+ds1-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | cacti | before 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | cacti | before 1.2.25-2.1 | 1.2.25-2.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | cacti | before 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | cacti-spine | before 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 |
Same product
cacti: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-46169Unauthenticated Command InjectionKEV99Now
- CVE-2024-29895Cacti command injection in cmd_realtime.php70This week
- CVE-2023-39361Unauthenticated SQL Injection in graph_view.php in Cacti66This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-48538Aug 22, 2023 · In Cacti 1.2.19, there is an authentication bypass in the web login functionality because of improper validation in the PHP code: cacti_ldap21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-48547Aug 22, 2023 · A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cacti 0.8.7g and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-39360Sep 5, 2023 · Reflected Cross-site Scripting in graphs_new.php in Cacti24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cacti cacti | 1.2.25 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:cacti | 1.2.24+ds1-1+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cacti | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cacti-spine | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cacti | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cacti-spine | 1.2.25-bp155.2.3.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2023-311320 days apartCacti Privilege Escalation31Monitor
- CVE-2022-4853814 days apartIn Cacti 1.2.19, there is an authentication bypass in the web login functionality because of improper validation in the PHP code: cacti_ldap21Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-23-0497 · Sep 6, 2023(Cacti Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
The query text is built by concatenating user input. The database cannot tell where the data ends and the command begins.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-89 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const owner = req.query.owner;
const rows = await db.query(
"SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = '" + owner + "'"
);Fixed
const owner = req.query.owner;
const rows = await db.query(
"SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = $1",
[owner]
);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Expanding Control over the Operating System from the DatabaseCAPEC-470Very High
- SQL InjectionCAPEC-66likelihood: High · High
- Blind SQL InjectionCAPEC-7likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.