CVE-2023-38488: Kirby vulnerable to field injection in the KirbyData text storage handler
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.92% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: getkirby/cms (Packagist) 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to getkirby/cms (Packagist) 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Kirby is a content management system. A vulnerability in versions prior to 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6 affects all Kirby sites that might have potential attackers in the group of authenticated Panel users or that allow external visitors to update a Kirby content file (e.g. via a contact or comment form). Kirby sites are *not* affected if they don't allow write access for untrusted users or visitors. A field injection in a content storage implementation is a type of vulnerability that allows attackers with content write access to overwrite content fields that the site developer didn't intend to be modified. In a Kirby site this can be used to alter site content, break site behavior or inject malicious data or code. The exact security risk depends on the field type and usage. Kirby stores content of the site, of pages, files and users in text files by default. The text files use Kirby's KirbyData format where each field is separated by newlines and a line with four dashes (`----`). When reading a KirbyData file, the affected code first removed the Unicode BOM sequence from the file contents and afterwards split the content into fields by the field separator. When writing to a KirbyData file, field separators in field data are escaped to prevent user input from interfering with the field structure. However this escaping could be tricked by including a Unicode BOM sequence in a field separator (e.g. `--\xEF\xBB\xBF--`). When writing, this was not detected as a separator, but because the BOM was removed during reading, it could be abused by attackers to inject other field data into content files. Because each field can only be defined once per content file, this vulnerability only affects fields in the content file that were defined above the vulnerable user-writable field or not at all. Fields that are defined below the vulnerable field override the injected field content and were therefore already protected. The problem has been patched in Kirby 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6. In all of the mentioned releases, the maintainers have fixed the affected code to only remove the Unicode BOM sequence at the beginning of the file. This fixes this vulnerability both for newly written as well as for existing content files.
- Published
- Jul 27, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 60th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-140
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.1
- 1.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| getkirby | kirby | cpe:2.3:a:getkirby:kirby |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- getkirby kirby3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.8.3
- getkirby kirby3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.6.3
- getkirby kirby3.7.0 and later · before 3.7.5.2
- getkirby kirby3.8.0 and later · before 3.8.4.1
- getkirby kirby3.9.0 and later · before 3.9.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
getkirby kirby
- < 3.5.8.3, >= 3.6.0, < 3.6.6.3, >= 3.7.0, < 3.7.5.2, >= 3.8.0, < 3.8.41, >= 3.9.0, < 3.9.6affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | getkirby/cms | from 3.6.0 · before 3.6.6.3 | 3.6.6.3 |
| Packagist | getkirby/cms | from 3.7.0 · before 3.7.5.2 | 3.7.5.2 |
| Packagist | getkirby/cms | from 3.8.0 · before 3.8.4.1 | 3.8.4.1 |
| Packagist | getkirby/cms | from 3.9.0 · before 3.9.6 | 3.9.6 |
| Packagist | getkirby/cms | before 3.5.8.3 | 3.5.8.3 |
Same product
getkirby: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-38490Kirby XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in the XML data handler41Plan
- CVE-2026-44177Kirby: Pre-authentication path traversal and PHP file inclusion during user lookup36Monitor
- CVE-2026-54003Kirby: External Initialization of the Panel on reverse proxy setups with the `Forwarded` header36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-39314Oct 24, 2022 · User enumeration in the code-based login and password reset forms14Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-39315Oct 25, 2022 · Kirby CMS vulnerable to user enumeration in the brute force protection21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-38489Jul 27, 2023 · Kirby vulnerable to Insufficient Session Expiration after a password change29Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Packagist:getkirby/cms | 3.5.8.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:getkirby/cms | 3.6.6.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:getkirby/cms | 3.7.5.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:getkirby/cms | 3.8.4.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:getkirby/cms | 3.9.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-140 · Improper Neutralization of DelimitersCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.