CVE-2023-38201: Keylime: challenge-response protocol bypass during agent registration
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: keylime (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1; keylime-base (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1; keylime-registrar (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to keylime (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1; keylime-base (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1; keylime-registrar (AlmaLinux:9) 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in the Keylime registrar that could allow a bypass of the challenge-response protocol during agent registration. This issue may allow an attacker to impersonate an agent and hide the true status of a monitored machine if the fake agent is added to the verifier list by a legitimate user, resulting in a breach of the integrity of the registrar database.
- Published
- Aug 25, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 41th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · redhat
- 6.5
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| keylime | keylime | cpe:2.3:a:keylime:keylime |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux for ibm z systems | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems |
| redhat | enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power little endian | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power little endian eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora38
- keylime keylimebefore 7.5.0
- redhat enterprise linux9.0
- redhat enterprise linux eus9.2
- redhat enterprise linux for ibm z systems9.0_s390x
- redhat enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus9.2_s390x
- redhat enterprise linux for power little endian9.0_ppc64le
- redhat enterprise linux for power little endian eus9.2_ppc64le
- redhat enterprise linux server aus9.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime-base | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime-registrar | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime-selinux | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime-tenant | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | keylime-verifier | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | python3-keylime | before 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | keylime | before 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 | 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 |
| PyPI | keylime | before 7.5.0 | 7.5.0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime-base | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime-registrar | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime-selinux | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime-tenant | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | keylime-verifier | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | python3-keylime | before 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | keylime | before 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 | 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 |
Same product
keylime: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-1709Keylime: keylime: authentication bypass allows unauthorized administrative operations due to missing client-side tls authentication41Plan
- CVE-2021-43310A vulnerability in Keylime before 6.3.0 allows an attacker to craft a request to the agent that resets the U and V keys as if the agent were40Plan
- CVE-2021-3406A flaw was found in keylime 5.8.1 and older.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-3500Nov 22, 2022 · A vulnerability was found in keylime.20Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-3674Jul 19, 2023 · Keylime: attestation failure when the quote's signature does not validate11Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-38200Jul 24, 2023 · Keylime: registrar is subject to a dos against ssl connections30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:keylime | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:keylime-base | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:keylime-registrar | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:keylime-selinux | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:keylime-tenant | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:keylime-verifier | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-keylime | 6.5.2-6.el9_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:keylime | 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:keylime | 7.5.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime-base | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime-registrar | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime-selinux | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime-tenant | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:keylime-verifier | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-keylime | 0:6.5.2-6.el9_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:keylime | 6.3.2-150400.4.20.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-38201
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222693
- github.com/keylime/keylime/commit/9e5ac9f25cd400b16d5969f531cee28290543f2a
- github.com/keylime/keylime/security/advisories/GHSA-f4r5-q63f-gcww
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZIZZB5NHNCS5D2AEH3ZAO6OQC72IK7WS/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.