Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA hp

CVE-2023-35178: Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Buffer Overflow when performing a GET request to scan jobs.

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Jun 30, 2023
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 33th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

35

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2023-35178

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
hpw1a75a firmware
hpw1a75a
hpw1a76a firmware
hpw1a76a
hpw1a77a firmware
hpw1a77a
hpw1a78a firmware
hpw1a78a
hpw1a79a firmware
hpw1a79a
hpw1a80a firmware
hpw1a80a

and 64 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • hp laserjet pro m304-m305 w1a46a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m304-m305 w1a47a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m304-m305 w1a48a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m304-m305 w1a66a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 93m22a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a51a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a52a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a53a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a56a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a57a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a58a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a59a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a60a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m404-m405 w1a63a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y40a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y41a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y43a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y44a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y45a firmwarebefore 002_2322c
  • hp laserjet pro m453-m454 w1y46a firmwarebefore 002_2322c

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hp). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • HP Inc. HP LaserJet Pro

    • See HP Security Bulletin reference for affected versions.affected

Same product

hp: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2023-35175Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Potential Remote Code Execution and/or Elevation of Privilege via Serve
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2023-35177Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow related to the compact font format parser
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2023-35176Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Buffer Overflow and/or Denial of Service when using the backup & restor
    35Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • Later →CVE-2025-43018Jul 30, 2025 · Certain HP LaserJet Pro Printers – Potential Information Disclosure
    27Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Fixed

c
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {  return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records