ETIC Telecom Insecure Default Initialization of Resource
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.33% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
ETIC Telecom RAS versions 4.7.0 and prior the web management portal authentication disabled by default. This could allow an attacker with adjacent network access to alter the configuration of the device or cause a denial-of-service condition.
- Published
- Aug 23, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 25th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1188
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.1
- CNA · icscert
- 7.1
- 1.0 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| etictelecom | remote access server firmware | cpe:2.3:o:etictelecom:remote_access_server_firmware |
| etictelecom | ras-c-100-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-c-100-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-e-100 | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-e-100 |
| etictelecom | ras-e-220 | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-e-220 |
| etictelecom | ras-e-400 | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-e-400 |
| etictelecom | ras-ec-220-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ec-220-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-ec-400-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ec-400-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-ec-480-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ec-480-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-ecw-220-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ecw-220-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-ecw-400-lw | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ecw-400-lw |
| etictelecom | ras-ew-100 | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ew-100 |
| etictelecom | ras-ew-220 | cpe:2.3:h:etictelecom:ras-ew-220 |
and 2 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- etictelecom remote access server firmwareup to 4.7.0 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (icscert). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS)
- up to and including 4.7.0affected
Same product
etictelecom: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-40981ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type40Plan
- CVE-2022-3703ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity40Plan
- CVE-2022-41607ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Path Traversal30Monitor
- CVE-2024-26153ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-Site Request Forgery25Monitor
- CVE-2024-26155ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information24Monitor
- CVE-2024-26157ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-site Scripting21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Haviv VaizmanOTORIOfinder
- Hay MizrachiOTORIOfinder
- Nikolay SokolikOTORIOfinder
- Ofir ManzurOTORIOfinder
- Alik KoldobskyOTORIOfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1188 · Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure DefaultCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.