CVE-2023-33299· NVD / CVE Program· CNA fortinet

A deserialization of untrusted data in Fortinet FortiNAC below 7.2.1, below 9.4.3, below 9.2.8 and all earlier versions of 8.x allows attack

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 46/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 24.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.8% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A deserialization of untrusted data in Fortinet FortiNAC below 7.2.1, below 9.4.3, below 9.2.8 and all earlier versions of 8.x allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted request on inter-server communication port. Note FortiNAC versions 8.x will not be fixed.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

BDU:2023-03917

Published: Jun 23, 2023
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 24.2% · 97th percentile
CWE: CWE-502

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS: 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 7 / 30 · 24.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: 9.8
CNA · fortinet: 9.6; 0.2 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:X/RC:C

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
fortinet	fortinac	cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortinac

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

fortinet fortinac8.5.0 and later · up to 8.5.4 inclusive
fortinet fortinac8.6.0 and later · up to 8.6.5 inclusive
fortinet fortinac8.7.0 and later · up to 8.7.6 inclusive
fortinet fortinac8.8.0 and later · up to 8.8.11 inclusive
fortinet fortinac9.1.0 and later · up to 9.1.9 inclusive
fortinet fortinac9.2.0 and later · up to 9.2.7 inclusive
fortinet fortinac7.2.0
fortinet fortinac7.2.1
fortinet fortinac8.3.7
fortinet fortinac9.4.0
fortinet fortinac9.4.1
fortinet fortinac9.4.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (fortinet). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

Fortinet FortiNAC
- 8.3.7affected
- 9.4.0 and later · up to and including 9.4.2affected · semver
- 9.2.0 and later · up to and including 9.2.7affected · semver
- 9.1.0 and later · up to and including 9.1.9affected · semver
- 8.8.0 and later · up to and including 8.8.11affected · semver
- 8.7.0 and later · up to and including 8.7.6affected · semver
- 8.6.0 and later · up to and including 8.6.5affected · semver
- 8.5.0 and later · up to and including 8.5.4affected · semver
- 7.2.0 and later · up to and including 7.2.1affected · semver

Same product

fortinet: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2022-39952A external control of file name or path in Fortinet FortiNAC versions 9.4.0, 9.2.0 through 9.2.5, 9.1.0 through 9.1.7, 8.8.0 through 8.8.11,
69This week
CVE-2022-38375An improper authorization vulnerability [CWE-285] in Fortinet FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.1 and before 9.2.6 allows an unauthenticat
39Monitor
CVE-2024-31488An improper neutralization of inputs during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.4, 9.2.0 throug
36Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2022-39946Jun 13, 2023 · An access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiNAC version 9.4.2 and below, version 9.2.7 and below, 9.1 all versions, 8.8 all versions,
28Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2023-22633Jun 13, 2023 · An improper permissions, privileges, and access controls vulnerability [CWE-264] in FortiNAC-F 7.2.0, FortiNAC 9.4.1 and below, 9.2.6 and be
30Monitor
Later →CVE-2023-26206Feb 15, 2024 · An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiNAC 9.4.0 - 9.4.2, 9.2.0 - 9.2.8, 9
24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
No account or password is required.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: high · the service can be disrupted

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: None
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: High
Availability impact: High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted Data

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

Data received over the network is deserialized into the language’s native object format without verifying its source. Code paths inside the object can be triggered during deserialization.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-502 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

python

1payload = sock.recv(65536)
2job = pickle.loads(payload)

Fixed

python

1payload = sock.recv(65536)
2if not hmac.compare_digest(sign(payload), header_sig):
3    raise PermissionError("invalid signature")
4job = JobSchema.validate(json.loads(payload))

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

Object InjectionCAPEC-586likelihood: Medium · High

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-23-074

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records