CVE-2023-32464: Dell VxRail, versions prior to 7.0.450, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 13/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Dell VxRail, versions prior to 7.0.450, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. A high privileged remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim’s data in transit.
- Published
- Jun 23, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
13
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 13 / 40 · 3.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 3.3
- CNA · dell
- 2.7
- 0.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| dell | vxrail d560 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_d560_firmware |
| dell | vxrail d560 | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_d560 |
| dell | vxrail d560f firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_d560f_firmware |
| dell | vxrail d560f | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_d560f |
| dell | vxrail e460 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_e460_firmware |
| dell | vxrail e460 | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_e460 |
| dell | vxrail e560 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_e560_firmware |
| dell | vxrail e560 | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_e560 |
| dell | vxrail e560 vcf firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_e560_vcf_firmware |
| dell | vxrail e560 vcf | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_e560_vcf |
| dell | vxrail e560f firmware | cpe:2.3:o:dell:vxrail_e560f_firmware |
| dell | vxrail e560f | cpe:2.3:h:dell:vxrail_e560f |
and 78 more
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- dell vxrail d560 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail d560f firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e460 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560 vcf firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560f firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560f vcf firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560n firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e560n vcf firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e660 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e660f firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e660n firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e665 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e665f firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail e665n firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail g560 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail g560 vcf firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail g560f firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail g560f vcf firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
- dell vxrail p470 firmware7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.450
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (dell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Dell Dell EMC VxRail Appliance
- 7.0.x versions before 7.0.450affected
Same product
dell: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-32463
Dell VxRail, version(s) 8.0.100 and earlier contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the upgrade functionality.30Monitor
- CVE-2025-21111Dell VxRail, versions 8.0.000 through 8.0.311, contain(s) a Plaintext Storage of a Password vulnerability.17Monitor
- CVE-2025-21102Dell VxRail, versions 7.0.000 through 7.0.532, contain(s) a Plaintext Storage of a Password vulnerability.17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.