A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.52% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openstack-ironic (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9; openstack-ironic-api (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9; openstack-ironic-common (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9.
- Mentioned 2 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openstack-ironic (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9; openstack-ironic-api (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9; openstack-ironic-common (Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9) 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat discovered that, when FIPS mode was enabled, not all of the cryptographic modules in use were FIPS-validated.
- Published
- Jul 5, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 43th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-693
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 7.0
- 0.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | openshift container platform | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | openshift container platform for linuxone | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform_for_linuxone |
| redhat | openshift container platform for power | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform_for_power |
| redhat | openshift container platform ibm z systems | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform_ibm_z_systems |
| redhat | openshift container platform for arm64 | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform_for_arm64 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat openshift container platform4.10
- redhat openshift container platform for arm644.10
- redhat openshift container platform for arm644.11
- redhat openshift container platform for arm644.12
- redhat openshift container platform for linuxone4.10
- redhat openshift container platform for linuxone4.11
- redhat openshift container platform for linuxone4.12
- redhat openshift container platform for power4.10
- redhat openshift container platform for power4.11
- redhat openshift container platform for power4.12
- redhat openshift container platform ibm z systems4.10
- redhat openshift container platform ibm z systems4.11
- redhat openshift container platform ibm z systems4.12
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a openshift
- 4.12.0not affected
Red Hat OpenShift Serverless
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.2.x
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.3.x
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.4
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat JBoss A-MQ Streams
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Openshift sandboxed containers
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic | before 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 | 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-api | before 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 | 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-common | before 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 | 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-conductor | before 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 | 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-dnsmasq-tftp-server | before 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 | 1:21.5.0-0.20231002130534.0df5961.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-inspector | before 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 | 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-inspector-api | before 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 | 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-inspector-conductor | before 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 | 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-inspector-dnsmasq | before 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 | 0:11.5.0-0.20230706175125.193aa0d.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | openstack-ironic-python-agent | before 0:9.5.0-0.20230728140546.fce0b8c.el9 | 0:9.5.0-0.20230728140546.fce0b8c.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-automaton | before 0:3.1.0-0.20230608140652.a4f7631.el9 | 0:3.1.0-0.20230608140652.a4f7631.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-cinderclient | before 0:9.3.0-0.20230608143053.f7a612e.el9 | 0:9.3.0-0.20230608143053.f7a612e.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-cliff | before 0:4.3.0-0.20230608150702.72e81d7.el9 | 0:4.3.0-0.20230608150702.72e81d7.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-debtcollector | before 0:2.5.0-0.20230308172820.a6b46c5.el9 | 0:2.5.0-0.20230308172820.a6b46c5.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-decorator | before 0:4.4.2-6.0.el9 | 0:4.4.2-6.0.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-dracclient | before 0:8.0.0-0.20230308200614.9c7499c.el9 | 0:8.0.0-0.20230308200614.9c7499c.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-fixtures | before 0:4.0.1-1.el9 | 0:4.0.1-1.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-futurist | before 0:2.4.1-0.20230308173923.159d752.el9 | 0:2.4.1-0.20230308173923.159d752.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-glanceclient | before 1:4.3.0-0.20230608143056.52fb6b2.el9 | 1:4.3.0-0.20230608143056.52fb6b2.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-hardware | before 0:0.30.0-0.20230308190813.f6ff0ed.el9 | 0:0.30.0-0.20230308190813.f6ff0ed.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-ironic-lib | before 0:5.4.1-0.20230706172632.25d8671.el9 | 0:5.4.1-0.20230706172632.25d8671.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-ironic-prometheus-exporter | before 0:4.1.1-0.20230614150617.7b35627.el9 | 0:4.1.1-0.20230614150617.7b35627.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-keystoneauth1 | before 0:5.2.0-0.20230608152518.2e40bbf.el9 | 0:5.2.0-0.20230608152518.2e40bbf.el9 |
| Red Hat:openshift_ironic:4.14::el9 | python-keystoneclient | before 1:5.1.0-0.20230608141554.4763cd8.el9 | 1:5.1.0-0.20230608141554.4763cd8.el9 |
+96
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-7481Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe.40Plan
- CVE-2018-1085openshift-ansible before versions 3.9.23, 3.7.46 deploys a misconfigured etcd file that causes the SSL client certificate authentication to 40Plan
- CVE-2020-27836A flaw was found in cluster-ingress-operator.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-1677Sep 1, 2022 · In OpenShift Container Platform, a user with permissions to create or modify Routes can craft a payload that inserts a malformed entry into 25Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-4294Dec 28, 2022 · OpenShift OSIN CheckClientSecret timing discrepancy23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-4145Oct 5, 2023 · A content spoofing flaw was found in OpenShift's OAuth endpoint.21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:containers-common | 1:1.2.4-1.1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift | 0:4.10.0-202306170106.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-hyperkube | 0:4.10.0-202306170106.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-catatonit | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-catatonit-debuginfo | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-debuginfo | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-debugsource | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-docker | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-plugins | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-plugins-debuginfo | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-remote | 0:3.2.3-1.1.rhaos4.10.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-23-0499 · Sep 7, 2023(Multicluster Engine Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
- TR-23-0437 · Aug 2, 2023(Mozilla Firefox Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-693 · Protection Mechanism FailureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Site TracingCAPEC-107likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Encryption Brute ForcingCAPEC-20likelihood: Low · Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Escaping a Sandbox by Calling Code in Another LanguageCAPEC-237likelihood: Low · Very High
- Using Unpublished Interfaces or FunctionalityCAPEC-36likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.