CVE-2023-27855: Rockwell Automation ThinManager ThinServer Path Traversal Upload
Noroxi assessment
Priority: This week (action score 60/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- A ready-made attack tool exists and the flaw can be exploited over the network without an account, so priority is at least “This week”.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 13.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 96.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window. Until a fix is released, restrict access to the affected component and follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In affected versions, a path traversal exists when processing a message in Rockwell Automation's ThinManager ThinServer. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to upload arbitrary files to any directory on the disk drive where ThinServer.exe is installed. The attacker could overwrite existing executable files with attacker-controlled, malicious contents, potentially causing remote code execution.
- Published
- Mar 21, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 13.4% · 96th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
60
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 4 / 30 · 13.4%
- Ready-made attack tool
- 17 / 60 · floor: at least 60
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · Rockwell
- 9.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Weaponized exploit exists
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rockwellautomation | thinmanager | cpe:2.3:a:rockwellautomation:thinmanager |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Rockwell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Rockwell Automation ThinManager ThinServer
- 6.x - 10.x, 11.0.0 - 11.0.5, 11.1.0 - 11.1.5, 11.2.0 - 11.2.6, 12.0.0 - 12.0.4, 12.1.0 - 12.1.5, 13.0.0 - 13.0.1affected
Affected versions · NVD (8)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rockwellautomation thinmanager6.0.0 and later · up to 10.0.2 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager11.0.0 and later · up to 11.0.5 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager11.1.0 and later · up to 11.1.5 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager11.2.0 and later · up to 11.2.6 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager12.0.0 and later · up to 12.0.4 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager12.1.0 and later · up to 12.1.5 inclusive
- rockwellautomation thinmanager13.0.0
- rockwellautomation thinmanager13.0.1
Same product
rockwellautomation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-27856Rockwell Automation ThinManager ThinServer Path Traversal Download60This week
- CVE-2022-38742Rockwell Automation ThinManager Software Vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution and Denial-Of-Service Attack46Plan
- CVE-2024-10386Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk ThinManager Authentication Vulnerability43Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2023-27857Mar 21, 2023 · Rockwell Automation ThinManager ThinServer Heap-Based Buffer Overflow36Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-2443May 11, 2023 ·
Rockwell Automation ThinManager product allows the use of medium strength ciphers.30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-2913Jul 18, 2023 · Rockwell Automation ThinManager ThinServer Path Traversal Vulnerability27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Metasploit module | auxiliary/admin/networking/thinmanager_traversal_uploadThinManager Path Traversal (CVE-2023-27855) Arbitrary File Uploadauxiliary | 2023-04-05 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Metasploit+14 d
- TodayNov 12, 2026+1332 d
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Security researchersTenable reported this to Rockwell Automation.finder
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.