CVE-2023-25000: Vault Vulnerable to Cache-Timing Attacks During Seal and Unseal Operations
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: HashiCorp Vault 1.11.0, 1.11.9, 1.12.5; HashiCorp Vault Enterprise 1.11.0, 1.11.9, 1.12.5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to HashiCorp Vault 1.11.0, 1.11.9, 1.12.5; HashiCorp Vault Enterprise 1.11.0, 1.11.9, 1.12.5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
HashiCorp Vault's implementation of Shamir's secret sharing used precomputed table lookups, and was vulnerable to cache-timing attacks. An attacker with access to, and the ability to observe a large number of unseal operations on the host through a side channel may reduce the search space of a brute force effort to recover the Shamir shares. Fixed in Vault 1.13.1, 1.12.5, and 1.11.9.
- Published
- Mar 29, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 11th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-208
Report tools
Action score
18
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 18 / 40 · 4.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.7
- CNA · HashiCorp
- 5.0
- 0.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hashicorp | vault | cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (HashiCorp). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
HashiCorp Vault
- 1.13.0 and later · before 1.13.1affected · semver
- 1.12.0 and later · before 1.12.5affected · semver
- 1.11.0 and later · before 1.11.9affected · semver
- before 1.11.0affected · semver
HashiCorp Vault Enterprise
- 1.13.0 and later · before 1.13.1affected · semver
- 1.12.0 and later · before 1.12.5affected · semver
- 1.11.0 and later · before 1.11.9affected · semver
- before 1.11.0affected · semver
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- hashicorp vaultbefore 1.11.9
- hashicorp vault1.12.0 and later · before 1.12.5
- hashicorp vault1.13.0 and later · before 1.13.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/vault | from 1.12.0 · before 1.12.5 | 1.12.5 |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/vault | from 1.13.0 · before 1.13.1 | 1.13.1 |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/vault | before 1.11.9 | 1.11.9 |
Same product
hashicorp: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-35192The official vault docker images before 0.11.6 contain a blank password for a root user.40Plan
- CVE-2024-2048Vault Cert Auth Method Did Not Correctly Validate Non-CA Certificates39Monitor
- CVE-2020-12757HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.4.0 and 1.4.1, when configured with the GCP Secrets Engine, may incorrectly generate GCP Credentials…39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-0620Mar 29, 2023 · Vault Vulnerable to SQL Injection When Configuring the Microsoft SQL Database Storage Backend26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-0665Mar 29, 2023 · Vault PKI Issuer Endpoint Did Not Correctly Authorize Access to Issuer Metadata26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-2197May 1, 2023 · Vault Enterprise Vulnerable to Padding Oracle Attacks When Using a CBC-based Encryption Mechanism with a HSM10Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| HashiCorp Vault | 1.11.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault | 1.11.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault | 1.12.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault | 1.13.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.11.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.11.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.12.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.13.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/vault | 1.11.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/vault | 1.12.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/vault | 1.13.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Giuseppe Cocomazzifinder
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-208 · Observable Timing DiscrepancyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.