CVE-2023-24488: Cross site scripting
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 48/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 81.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 12.1-55.296, 12.1-65.35, 13.0-90.11 .
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 12.1-55.296, 12.1-65.35, 13.0-90.11 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Cross site scripting vulnerability in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway in allows and attacker to perform cross site scripting
- Published
- Jul 10, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 81.1% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-79
Report tools
Action score
48
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 24 / 30 · 81.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.1
- CNA · Citrix
- 6.1
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| citrix | gateway | cpe:2.3:a:citrix:gateway |
| citrix | application delivery controller | cpe:2.3:a:citrix:application_delivery_controller |
Limit the impact of XSS
This is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A well-configured Content-Security-Policy doesn't fix it, but greatly reduces its impact. Check your site's CSP and other security headers for free.
Check security headersAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- citrix application delivery controller12.1 and later · before 12.1-55.296
- citrix application delivery controller12.1 and later · before 12.1-65.35
- citrix application delivery controller13.0 and later · before 13.0-90.11
- citrix application delivery controller13.1 and later · before 13.1-45.61
- citrix gateway13.0 and later · before 13.0-90.11
- citrix gateway13.1 and later · before 13.1-45.61
- citrix gateway12.1 and later · before 12.1-65.35
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Citrix). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway
- 13.1 and later · before 13.1-45.61affected · patch
- 13.0 and later · before 13.0-90.11affected · patch
- 12.1 and later · before 12.1-65.35affected · patch
- 12.1-FIPS and later · before 12.1-55.296affected · patch
- 13.1-FIPS and later · before 13.1-37.150affected · patch
- 12.1-NDcPP and later · before 12.1-55.296affected · patch
Same product
citrix: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-27516User login brute force protection functionality bypass39Monitor
- CVE-2022-27510Unauthorized access to Gateway user capabilities39Monitor
- CVE-2022-27513Remote desktop takeover via phishing38Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-8300Jun 16, 2021 · Citrix ADC and Citrix/NetScaler Gateway before 13.0-82.41, 12.1-62.23, 11.1-65.20 and Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.238 suffer from im27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-27509Jul 28, 2022 · Unauthenticated redirection to a malicious website24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-27507Jan 26, 2023 · Authenticated denial of service26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway | 12.1-55.296 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway | 12.1-65.35 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway | 13.0-90.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway | 13.1-37.150 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Citrix Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway | 13.1-45.61 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×4
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2023-24488 | — |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:9 | 2023-07-01 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:14 | 2023-07-04 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2023-07-06 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2023-07-31 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-10 d
- Published
- TodayOct 26, 2026+1203 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-23-0393 · Jul 11, 2023(Citrix Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-79 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;Fixed
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.