Proofpoint Enterprise Protection webutils authenticated RCE
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.73% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 53.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: proofpoint enterprise_protection 8.13.22 patch 4566, 8.18.4 patch 4567, 8.18.6 patch 4568.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to proofpoint enterprise_protection 8.13.22 patch 4566, 8.18.4 patch 4567, 8.18.6 patch 4568 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The webutils in Proofpoint Enterprise Protection (PPS/POD) contain a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to execute remote code through 'eval injection'. This affects all versions 8.20.0 and below.
- Published
- Mar 7, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 53th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-95
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · Proofpoint
- 8.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| proofpoint | enterprise protection | cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:enterprise_protection |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- proofpoint enterprise protectionbefore 8.13.22
- proofpoint enterprise protection8.18.0 and later · before 8.18.4
- proofpoint enterprise protection8.18.6
- proofpoint enterprise protection8.20.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Proofpoint). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
proofpoint enterprise_protection
- 8.* and later · up to and including 8.20.0affected · semverfixed in 8.20.0 patch 4570, 8.18.6 patch 4568, 8.18.4 patch 4567, 8.13.22 patch 4566
Same product
proofpoint: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-0090Proofpoint Enterprise Protection webservices unauthenticated RCE39Monitor
- CVE-2022-46332Proofpoint Enterprise Protection (PPS/PoD) XSS in "Attachment Names"38Monitor
- CVE-2019-19680A file-extension filtering vulnerability in Proofpoint Enterprise Protection (PPS / PoD), in the unpatched versions of PPS through 8.9.22 an35Monitor
- CVE-2022-46334Proofpoint Enterprise Protection Local Privilege Escalation31Monitor
- CVE-2024-3676The Proofpoint Encryption endpoint of Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that allows an un30Monitor
- CVE-2021-39304Proofpoint Enterprise Protection before 8.12.0-2108090000 allows security control bypass.30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| proofpoint enterprise_protection | 8.13.22 patch 4566 | Vendor (CNA) |
| proofpoint enterprise_protection | 8.18.4 patch 4567 | Vendor (CNA) |
| proofpoint enterprise_protection | 8.18.6 patch 4568 | Vendor (CNA) |
| proofpoint enterprise_protection | 8.20.0 patch 4570 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-07-07 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+1217 d
- TodayOct 16, 2026+1319 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- ly1g3finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-95 · Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.