CVE-2022-46886: There exists an open redirect within the response list update functionality of ServiceNow.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.29% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ServiceNow ServiceNow Rome Patch 10 Hotfix 3b, San Diego Patch 9, Tokyo Patch 3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ServiceNow ServiceNow Rome Patch 10 Hotfix 3b, San Diego Patch 9, Tokyo Patch 3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
There exists an open redirect within the response list update functionality of ServiceNow. This allows attackers to redirect users to arbitrary domains when clicking on a URL within a service-now domain.
- Published
- Apr 14, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 22th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-601
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.1
- CNA · SN
- 5.5
- 0.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| servicenow | servicenow | cpe:2.3:a:servicenow:servicenow |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- servicenow servicenowquebec
- servicenow servicenowrome
- servicenow servicenowsan_diego
- servicenow servicenowtokyo
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (SN). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ServiceNow ServiceNow
- Tokyo and later · before Tokyo Patch 1baffectedfixed in Tokyo Patch 3
- San Diego and later · before San Diego Patch 7baffectedfixed in San Diego Patch 9
- Rome and later · before Rome Patch 10 Hotfix 2baffectedfixed in Rome Patch 10 Hotfix 3b
- Quebec and later · before Quebec Patch 10 Hotfix 10baffected
Same product
servicenow: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-4879Jelly Template Injection Vulnerability in ServiceNow UI MacrosKEV97Now
- CVE-2024-5217Incomplete Input Validation in GlideExpression ScriptKEV96Now
- CVE-2024-8923Sandbox Escape in Now Platform37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-42704Jan 12, 2023 · A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Employee Service Center (esc) and Service Portal (sp) in ServiceNow Quebec, Rome, and San Dieg21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-39048Apr 10, 2023 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ServiceNow UI page assessment_redirect24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-46389Apr 17, 2023 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found on logout functionality24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ServiceNow ServiceNow | Rome Patch 10 Hotfix 3b | Vendor (CNA) |
| ServiceNow ServiceNow | San Diego Patch 9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| ServiceNow ServiceNow | Tokyo Patch 3 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- theamanrawatfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-601 · URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.