Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2022-45355· NVD / CVE Program· CNA Patchstack

WordPress WP Pipes Plugin <= 1.33 is vulnerable to SQL Injection (SQLi)

Auth. (admin+) SQL Injection (SQLi) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Pipes plugin <= 1.33 versions.

HighCVSS 7.2 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 29, 2023
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.6% · 49th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
28 / 40 · 7.2 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
7.2
CNA · Patchstack
8.2
1.0 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
thimpresswp pipes

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • thimpress wp pipesup to 1.33 inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Patchstack). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ThimPress WP Pipes

    • n/a and later · up to and including 1.33affectedfixed in 1.4.0

Same product

thimpress: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-28979WordPress WP Pipes <= 1.4.3 - Local File Inclusion Vulnerability
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2025-28982WordPress WP Pipes plugin <= 1.4.3 - SQL Injection Vulnerability
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2025-48267WordPress WP Pipes plugin <= 1.4.2 - Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2025-60227WordPress WP Pipes plugin <= 1.4.3 - Arbitrary File Deletion vulnerability
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-47664WordPress WP Pipes <= 1.4.2 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
    26Monitor
  • CVE-2023-40009WordPress WP Pipes Plugin <= 1.4.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
    26Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
ThimPress WP Pipes1.4.0Vendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • Administrator privileges are required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

The query text is built by concatenating user input. The database cannot tell where the data ends and the command begins.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-89 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const owner = req.query.owner;const rows = await db.query(  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = '" + owner + "'");

Fixed

ts
const owner = req.query.owner;const rows = await db.query(  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = $1",  [owner]);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records