NVD / CVE Program· CNA SN

CVE-2022-43684: ACL bypass in Reporting functionality

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 78.4% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 9.9, NVD 6.5.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

ServiceNow has released patches and an upgrade that address an Access Control List (ACL) bypass issue in ServiceNow Core functionality. Additional Details This issue is present in the following supported ServiceNow releases: * Quebec prior to Patch 10 Hot Fix 8b * Rome prior to Patch 10 Hot Fix 1 * San Diego prior to Patch 7 * Tokyo prior to Tokyo Patch 1; and * Utah prior to Utah General Availability If this ACL bypass issue were to be successfully exploited, it potentially could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from tables missing authorization controls.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Info leak

Published: Jun 13, 2023
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 1.8% · 78th percentile
CWE: CWE-200

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 1 / 30 · 1.8%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: 6.5
CNA · SN: 9.9; 3.4 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
servicenow	servicenow	cpe:2.3:a:servicenow:servicenow

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

servicenow servicenowquebec
servicenow servicenowrome
servicenow servicenowsan_diego
servicenow servicenowtokyo
servicenow servicenowutah

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (SN). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

ServiceNow Now Platform
- Quebec and later · before Patch 10 Hot Fix 8baffected
- Rome and later · before Patch 10 Hot Fix 1affected
- San Diego and later · before Patch 7affected
- Tokyo and later · before Tokyo Patch 1affected
- Utah and later · before Utah General Availability (GA)affected

Same product

servicenow: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2024-4879Jelly Template Injection Vulnerability in ServiceNow UI MacrosKEV
97Now
CVE-2024-5217Incomplete Input Validation in GlideExpression ScriptKEV
96Now
CVE-2024-8923Sandbox Escape in Now Platform
37Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2022-46389Apr 17, 2023 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found on logout functionality
24Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2023-1209May 23, 2023 · Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities exist in ServiceNow records allowing an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary scripts.
21Monitor
Later →CVE-2023-1298Jul 6, 2023 · ServiceNow has released upgrades and patches that address a Reflected Cross-Site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that was identified in the Se
24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

ServiceNow DisclosureHackerOne · disclosure only (VDP)

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
A low-privileged account is enough.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: none
Availability: none

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: Low
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: None
Availability impact: None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Root cause

The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-200 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

json

1{
2  "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],
3  "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }
4}

Fixed

json

1{
2  "permissions": ["activeTab"],
3  "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]
4}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

packetstormsecurity.com/files/173354/ServiceNow-Insecure-Access-Control-Full-Admin-Compromise.html

Show all references (4 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records