CVE-2022-38371: A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 75.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), Desigo PXC00-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC00-U (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC001-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC100-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC12-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC128-U (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC200-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC22-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC22.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC36.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC50-E.D (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXC64-U (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Desigo PXM20-E (All versions >= V2.3 < V6.30.37), Nucleus NET for Nucleus PLUS V1 (All versions < V5.2a), Nucleus NET for Nucleus PLUS V2 (All versions < V5.4), Nucleus ReadyStart V3 V2012 (All versions < V2012.08.1), Nucleus ReadyStart V3 V2017 (All versions < V2017.02.4), Nucleus Source Code (All versions including affected FTP server), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The FTP server does not properly release memory resources that were reserved for incomplete connection attempts by FTP clients. This could allow a remote attacker to generate a denial of service condition on devices that incorporate a vulnerable version of the FTP server.
- Published
- Oct 11, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.5% · 75th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · siemens
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| siemens | nucleus net | cpe:2.3:a:siemens:nucleus_net |
| siemens | nucleus readystart v3 | cpe:2.3:a:siemens:nucleus_readystart_v3 |
| siemens | nucleus source code | cpe:2.3:a:siemens:nucleus_source_code |
| siemens | apogee modular building controller firmware | cpe:2.3:o:siemens:apogee_modular_building_controller_firmware |
| siemens | apogee modular building controller | cpe:2.3:h:siemens:apogee_modular_building_controller |
| siemens | apogee modular equiment controller firmware | cpe:2.3:o:siemens:apogee_modular_equiment_controller_firmware |
| siemens | apogee modular equiment controller | cpe:2.3:h:siemens:apogee_modular_equiment_controller |
| siemens | apogee pxc compact firmware | cpe:2.3:o:siemens:apogee_pxc_compact_firmware |
| siemens | apogee pxc compact | cpe:2.3:h:siemens:apogee_pxc_compact |
| siemens | apogee pxc modular firmware | cpe:2.3:o:siemens:apogee_pxc_modular_firmware |
| siemens | apogee pxc modular | cpe:2.3:h:siemens:apogee_pxc_modular |
| siemens | desigo pxc00-e.d firmware | cpe:2.3:o:siemens:desigo_pxc00-e.d_firmware |
and 27 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- siemens apogee modular building controller firmwareall versions
- siemens apogee modular equiment controller firmwareall versions
- siemens apogee pxc compact firmwareall versions
- siemens apogee pxc modular firmwareall versions
- siemens desigo pxc00-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc00-u firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc001-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc100-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc12-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc128-u firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc200-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc22-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc22.1-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc36.1-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc50-e.d firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxc64-u firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens desigo pxm20-e firmwareup to 2.3 inclusive
- siemens nucleus netall versions
- siemens nucleus readystart v3all versions
- siemens nucleus source codeall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (siemens). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Siemens APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet)
- All versionsaffected
Siemens APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet)
- All versionsaffected
Siemens APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet)
- All versionsaffected
Siemens APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet)
- All versionsaffected
Siemens APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet)
- before V3.5.7affected
Siemens APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet)
- before V2.8.21affected
Siemens APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet)
- before V3.5.7affected
Siemens APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet)
- before V2.8.21affected
Siemens Desigo PXC00-E.D
- V2.3 and later · before V6.30.37affected
Siemens Desigo PXC00-U
- V2.3 and later · before V6.30.37affected
Siemens Desigo PXC001-E.D
- V2.3 and later · before V6.30.37affected
Siemens Desigo PXC100-E.D
- V2.3 and later · before V6.30.37affected
Same product
siemens: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-31886A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (40Plan
- CVE-2021-31888A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (36Monitor
- CVE-2021-31887A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-27009Apr 22, 2021 · A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions <34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-27736Apr 22, 2021 · A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions <27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-27393Apr 22, 2021 · A vulnerability has been identified in Nucleus NET (All versions), Nucleus ReadyStart V3 (All versions < V2013.08), Nucleus Source Code (Ver21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.