Debug tool in Secomea SiteManager allows logged-in administrator to modify system state in an unintended manner.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.54% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Dec 13, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 45th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-267
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · Secomea
- 5.7
- 0.8 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| secomea | sitemanager 1129 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_1129_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 1129 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_1129 |
| secomea | sitemanager 3329 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_3329_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 3329 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_3329 |
| secomea | sitemanager 1529 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_1529_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 1529 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_1529 |
| secomea | sitemanager 3529 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_3529_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 3529 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_3529 |
| secomea | sitemanager 1139 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_1139_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 1139 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_1139 |
| secomea | sitemanager 3339 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:sitemanager_3339_firmware |
| secomea | sitemanager 3339 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:sitemanager_3339 |
and 12 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- secomea sitemanager 1129 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 1139 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 1149 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 1529 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 1539 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 1549 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3329 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3339 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3349 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3529 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3539 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
- secomea sitemanager 3549 firmwarebefore 10.0.622425017
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Secomea). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Secomea SiteManager
- up to and including 10.0.622425017affected · "custom"
Same product
secomea: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-32010Clients may connect to a GateManager with TLS 1.032Monitor
- CVE-2022-25785Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in SiteManager allows logged-in or local user to cause arbitrary code execution.28Monitor
- CVE-2021-32005SiteManager Log View XSS Issue21Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-29027Feb 16, 2021 · Reflected Cross Site Scripting21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-25784May 4, 2022 · User controllable HTML element attribute (potential XSS)19Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-267 · Privilege Defined With Unsafe ActionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Restful Privilege ElevationCAPEC-58likelihood: High · High
- Probe Audio and Video PeripheralsCAPEC-634likelihood: Low · High
- Collect Data from ClipboardCAPEC-637likelihood: Low · Low
- Identify Shared Files/Directories on SystemCAPEC-643likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Collect Data from Screen CaptureCAPEC-648likelihood: Medium · Medium
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.