CVE-2022-3647: Redis Crash Report debug.c sigsegvHandler denial of service
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 13/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.62% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: n/a Redis 6.2.8.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to n/a Redis 6.2.8 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
** DISPUTED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Redis up to 6.2.7/7.0.5. Affected is the function sigsegvHandler of the file debug.c of the component Crash Report. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. Upgrading to version 6.2.8 and 7.0.6 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 0bf90d944313919eb8e63d3588bf63a367f020a3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-211962 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor claims that this is not a DoS because it applies to the crash logging mechanism which is triggered after a crash has occurred.
- Published
- Oct 21, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 49th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-404
Report tools
Action score
13
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 13 / 40 · 3.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 3.3
- CNA · VulDB
- 3.1
- 0.2 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redis | redis | cpe:2.3:a:redis:redis |
Using redis? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Redis)
Is Redis on your server exposed to the internet?
The free port scanner finds the open ports on your server and matches the service versions it can read against known vulnerabilities. No account needed.
Run a port scanAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redis redisbefore 6.2.8
- redis redis7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a Redis
- 6.2.0, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 7.0.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3 … (+2)affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.16 | redis | from 7.0.0 · before 7.0.7-r0 | 7.0.7-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.17 | redis | from 7.0.0 · before 7.0.6-r0 | 7.0.6-r0 |
| Debian:12 | redis | from 0 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | redis | before 6.0.14-150200.6.14.1 | 6.0.14-150200.6.14.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | redis | before 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 | 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | redis | before 7.0.5-3.1 | 7.0.5-3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | redis | before 6.0.14-150200.6.14.1 | 6.0.14-150200.6.14.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | redis | before 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 | 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 |
Same product
redis: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-0543It was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox escapeKEV100Now
- CVE-2025-49844Redis Lua Use-After-Free may lead to remote code execution64This week
- CVE-2023-36824Heap overflow in COMMAND GETKEYS and ACL evaluation in Redis58Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-31144Jul 19, 2022 · Potential heap overflow in Redis36Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-35951Sep 23, 2022 · Redis subject to Integer Overflow leading to Remote Code Execution via Heap Overflow40Plan
- Later →CVE-2022-3734Oct 28, 2022 · Redis on Windows dbghelp.dll uncontrolled search path39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| n/a Redis | 6.2.8 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:redis | 7.0.7-r0 · Alpine:v3.16 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:redis | 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:redis | 6.2.6-150400.3.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- arkamar (VulDB User)analyst
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-404 · Improper Resource Shutdown or ReleaseCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.