CVE-2022-34903: GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constrai
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: gnupg2 (AlmaLinux:8) 2.2.20-3.el8_6; gnupg2-smime (AlmaLinux:8) 2.2.20-3.el8_6; gnupg2 (AlmaLinux:9) 2.3.3-2.el9_0.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to gnupg2 (AlmaLinux:8) 2.2.20-3.el8_6; gnupg2-smime (AlmaLinux:8) 2.2.20-3.el8_6; gnupg2 (AlmaLinux:9) 2.3.3-2.el9_0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.
- Published
- Jul 1, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.8% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-74
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnupg | gnupg | cpe:2.3:a:gnupg:gnupg |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
| netapp | ontap select deploy administration utility | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux11.0
- fedoraproject fedora35
- fedoraproject fedora36
- gnupg gnupgup to 2.3.6 inclusive
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
- netapp ontap select deploy administration utilityall versions
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | gnupg2 | before 2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gnupg2-smime | before 2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnupg2 | before 2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnupg2-smime | before 2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Alpine:v3.13 | gnupg | before 2.2.31-r1 | 2.2.31-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.15 | gnupg | before 2.2.31-r2 | 2.2.31-r2 |
| Alpine:v3.16 | gnupg | before 2.2.35-r4 | 2.2.35-r4 |
| Debian:10 | gnupg2 | before 2.2.12-1+deb10u2 | 2.2.12-1+deb10u2 |
| Debian:11 | gnupg2 | before 2.2.27-2+deb11u2 | 2.2.27-2+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | gnupg2 | before 2.2.35-3 | 2.2.35-3 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | gpg2 | before 2.2.27-150300.3.5.1 | 2.2.27-150300.3.5.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | gpg2 | before 2.3.7-1.1 | 2.3.7-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | gnupg2 | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | gnupg2-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | gnupg2-debugsource | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | gnupg2-smime | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | gnupg2-smime-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnupg2-debuginfo | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnupg2-debugsource | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnupg2-smime | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnupg2-smime-debuginfo | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | gnupg2 | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
| Rocky Linux:8 | gnupg2 | before 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
| Rocky Linux:9 | gnupg2 | before 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 | 0:2.3.3-2.el9_0 |
+3
Same product
gnupg: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-24881In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a crafted CMS (S/MIME) EnvelopedData message carrying an oversized wrapped session key can cause a stack-based buffe40Plan
- CVE-2008-1530GnuPG (gpg) 1.4.8 and 2.0.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted dup38Monitor
- CVE-2018-1000858GnuPG version 2.1.12 - 2.2.11 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dirmngr that can result in Attacker controlled CS35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14855Mar 20, 2020 · A flaw was found in the way certificate signatures could be forged using collisions found in the SHA-1 algorithm.30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-25125Sep 3, 2020 · GnuPG 2.2.21 and 2.2.22 (and Gpg4win 3.1.12) has an array overflow, leading to a crash or possibly unspecified other impact, when a victim i31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-3219Feb 23, 2023 · GnuPG can be made to spin on a relatively small input by (for example) crafting a public key with thousands of signatures attached, compress13Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:gnupg2 | 2.2.20-3.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnupg2-smime | 2.2.20-3.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:gnupg | 2.2.31-r1 · Alpine:v3.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:gnupg2 | 2.2.35-3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:gpg2 | 2.2.27-150300.3.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnupg2 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnupg2-debuginfo | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnupg2-debugsource | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnupg2-smime | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnupg2-smime-debuginfo | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:gnupg2 | 0:2.2.20-3.el8_6 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:gpg2 | 2.0.24-9.11.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:gpg2 | 2.2.27-150300.3.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0615 · Sep 14, 2022(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- HTTP Request SplittingCAPEC-105likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Format String InjectionCAPEC-135likelihood: High · High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
- dev.gnupg.org/T6027
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FRLWJQ76A4UKHI3Q36BKSJKS4LFLQO33/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NPTAR76EIZY7NQFENSOZO7U473257OVZ/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VN63GBTMRWO36Y7BKA2WQHROAKCXKCBL/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU64FUVG2PRZBSHFOQRSP7KDVEIZ23OS/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220826-0005/
- www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5174
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.