HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.9.16, 1.10.9, and 1.11.4 may allow server side request forgery when the Consul client agent f
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB / GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 8.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 95.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: n/a n/a 1.9.17.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to n/a n/a 1.9.17 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.9.16, 1.10.9, and 1.11.4 may allow server side request forgery when the Consul client agent follows redirects returned by HTTP health check endpoints. Fixed in 1.9.17, 1.10.10, and 1.11.5.
- Published
- Apr 19, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 8.7% · 95th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 3 / 30 · 8.7%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hashicorp | consul | cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:consul |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora37
- hashicorp consulbefore 1.9.17
- hashicorp consul1.10.0 and later · before 1.10.10
- hashicorp consul1.11.0 and later · before 1.11.5
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | consul | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/consul | from 1.10.0 · before 1.10.10 | 1.10.10 |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/consul | from 1.11.0 · before 1.11.5 | 1.11.5 |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/consul | before 1.9.17 | 1.9.17 |
Same product
hashicorp: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-41805HashiCorp Consul Enterprise before 1.8.17, 1.9.x before 1.9.11, and 1.10.x before 1.10.4 has Incorrect Access Control.45Plan
- CVE-2021-37219HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.10.1 Raft RPC layer allows non-server agents with a valid certificate signed by the same CA to acce35Monitor
- CVE-2026-87090Consul vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the catalog node-write path33Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-38698Sep 7, 2021 · HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.10.1 Txn.Apply endpoint allowed services to register proxies for other services, enabling access to26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-24687Feb 24, 2022 · HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.9.0 through 1.9.14, 1.10.7, and 1.11.2 clusters with at least one Ingress Gateway allow a user with26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-41803Sep 22, 2022 · HashiCorp Consul 1.8.1 up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 do not properly validate the node or segment names prior to interpolation and usage 28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| n/a n/a | 1.9.17 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/consul | 1.10.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/consul | 1.11.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/hashicorp/consul | 1.9.17 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2022-29153 | — |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- discuss.hashicorp.com
- discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2022-10-consul-s-http-health-check-may-allow-server-side-request-forgery/
- discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2022-10-consul-s-http-health-check-may-allow-server-side-request-forgery/38393
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RBODKZL7HQE5XXS3SA2VIDVL4LAA5RWH/
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-09
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.