CVE-2022-27646: This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NETGEAR R6700v3 1.0.4.120_10.0.9
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 73% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NETGEAR R6700v3 1.0.4.120_10.0.91 routers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the circled daemon. A crafted circleinfo.txt file can trigger an overflow of a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-15879.
- Published
- Mar 29, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 73th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-121
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · zdi
- 8.0
- 0.8 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | r6400 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6400_firmware |
| netgear | r6400 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6400 |
| netgear | r6700 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6700_firmware |
| netgear | r6700 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6700 |
| netgear | r6900p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6900p_firmware |
| netgear | r6900p | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6900p |
| netgear | r7000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r7000_firmware |
| netgear | r7000 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r7000 |
| netgear | r7000p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r7000p_firmware |
| netgear | r7000p | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r7000p |
| netgear | r7850 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r7850_firmware |
| netgear | r7850 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r7850 |
and 36 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear cbr40 firmwarebefore 2.5.0.28
- netgear lbr1020 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.2
- netgear lbr20 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.2
- netgear r6400 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.126
- netgear r6700 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.126
- netgear r6900p firmwarebefore 1.3.3.148
- netgear r7000 firmwarebefore 1.0.11.134
- netgear r7000p firmwarebefore 1.3.3.148
- netgear r7850 firmwarebefore 1.0.5.84
- netgear r7960p firmwarebefore 1.4.3.88
- netgear r8000 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.84
- netgear r8000p firmwarebefore 1.4.3.88
- netgear rax200 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.138
- netgear rax75 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.138
- netgear rax80 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.138
- netgear rbr10 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.24
- netgear rbr20 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.24
- netgear rbr40 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.24
- netgear rbr50 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.24
- netgear rbs10 firmwarebefore 2.7.4.24
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (zdi). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NETGEAR R6700v3
- 1.0.4.120_10.0.91affected
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-27643This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NETGEAR R6700v3 1.0.4.120_10.0.943Plan
- CVE-2020-11789Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an unauthenticated attacker.40Plan
- CVE-2022-27644This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to compromise the integrity of downloaded information on affected installations of NETG35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-45605Dec 25, 2021 · Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an authenticated user.35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-45606Dec 25, 2021 · Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an authenticated user.35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-45655Dec 25, 2021 · NETGEAR R6400 devices before 1.0.1.70 are affected by server-side injection.27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:8 | 2023-06-01 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+63 d
- TodayNov 2, 2026+1314 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-121 · Stack-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.