CVE-2022-24714: Disclosure of hosts and related data, linked to decommissioned services in Icinga Web 2
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 69% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: icingaweb2 (Debian:12) 2.9.6-1; icingaweb2 (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1; icingaweb2 (SUSE:Package Hub 12) 2.8.6-15.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to icingaweb2 (Debian:12) 2.9.6-1; icingaweb2 (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1; icingaweb2 (SUSE:Package Hub 12) 2.8.6-15.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Icinga Web 2 is an open source monitoring web interface, framework and command-line interface. Installations of Icinga 2 with the IDO writer enabled are affected. If you use service custom variables in role restrictions, and you regularly decommission service objects, users with said roles may still have access to a collection of content. Note that this only applies if a role has implicitly permitted access to hosts, due to permitted access to at least one of their services. If access to a host is permitted by other means, no sensible information has been disclosed to unauthorized users. This issue has been resolved in versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6 and 2.10 of Icinga Web 2.
- Published
- Mar 8, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-863
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 5.3
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| icinga | icinga web 2 | cpe:2.3:a:icinga:icinga_web_2 |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Icinga icingaweb2
- < 2.8.6, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- icinga icinga web 2before 2.8.6
- icinga icinga web 22.9.0 and later · before 2.9.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | icingaweb2 | before 2.9.6-1 | 2.9.6-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | icingaweb2 | before 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 | 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | icingaweb2 | before 2.8.6-15.1 | 2.8.6-15.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP3 | icingaweb2 | before 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 | 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 |
Same product
icinga: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-24716Path traversal in Icinga Web 260This week
- CVE-2022-24715Arbitrary code execution for authenticated users in Icinga Web 239Monitor
- CVE-2018-18249Icinga Web 2 before 2.6.2 allows injection of PHP ini-file directives via vectors involving environment variables as the channel to send…39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-18250Dec 17, 2018 · Icinga Web 2 before 2.6.2 allows parameters that break navigation dashlets, as demonstrated by a single '$' character as the Name of a…30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-24368Aug 19, 2020 · Icinga Icinga Web2 2.0.0 through 2.6.4, 2.7.4 and 2.8.2 has a Directory Traversal vulnerability which allows an attacker to access…31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-27404Mar 26, 2025 · Icinga Web 2 DOM-based XSS vulnerability24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:icingaweb2 | 2.9.6-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:icingaweb2 | 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:icingaweb2 | 2.8.6-15.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:icingaweb2 | 2.8.6-bp153.2.3.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-863 · Incorrect AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.