CVE-2022-21722: Potential out-of-bound read during RTP/RTCP parsing in PJSIP
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 83.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: pjproject (Alpine:v3.16) 2.12-r0; asterisk (Debian:10) 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb10u1; ring (Debian:10) 20190215.1.f152c98~ds1-1+deb10u2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pjproject (Alpine:v3.16) 2.12-r0; asterisk (Debian:10) 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb10u1; ring (Debian:10) 20190215.1.f152c98~ds1-1+deb10u2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C language implementing standard based protocols such as SIP, SDP, RTP, STUN, TURN, and ICE. In version 2.11.1 and prior, there are various cases where it is possible that certain incoming RTP/RTCP packets can potentially cause out-of-bound read access. This issue affects all users that use PJMEDIA and accept incoming RTP/RTCP. A patch is available as a commit in the `master` branch. There are no known workarounds.
- Published
- Jan 26, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.3% · 83th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
37
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.1
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 9.1
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- teluu pjsipup to 2.11.1 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
pjsip pjproject
- <= 2.11.1affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.16 | pjproject | before 2.12-r0 | 2.12-r0 |
| Debian:10 | asterisk | before 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb10u1 | 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb10u1 |
| Debian:10 | ring | before 20190215.1.f152c98~ds1-1+deb10u2 | 20190215.1.f152c98~ds1-1+deb10u2 |
| Debian:11 | asterisk | before 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u1 | 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u1 |
| Debian:11 | ring | before 20210112.2.b757bac~ds1-1+deb11u1 | 20210112.2.b757bac~ds1-1+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | ring | before 20230206.0~ds1-1 | 20230206.0~ds1-1 |
| Debian:14 | asterisk | before 1:18.12.0~dfsg+~cs6.12.40431413-1 | 1:18.12.0~dfsg+~cs6.12.40431413-1 |
| Debian:9 | pjproject | before 2.5.5~dfsg-6+deb9u3 | 2.5.5~dfsg-6+deb9u3 |
Same product
teluu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-31031Potential stack buffer overflow when parsing message as a STUN client40Plan
- CVE-2022-24754Buffer overflow in pjsip40Plan
- CVE-2022-23608Use after free in PJSIP40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-43845Dec 27, 2021 · Prevent out-of-bounds read in PJSIP37Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-41141Jan 4, 2022 · Missing release of locks in PJSIP30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-21723Jan 26, 2022 · Out-of-bounds read in multipart parsing in PJSIP37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:pjproject | 2.12-r0 · Alpine:v3.16 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:asterisk | 1:18.12.0~dfsg+~cs6.12.40431413-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:pjproject | 2.5.5~dfsg-6+deb9u3 · Debian:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:ring | 20230206.0~ds1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
- github.com/pjsip/pjproject/security/advisories/GHSA-m66q-q64c-hv36
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00035.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/11/msg00021.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00038.html
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-37
- www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5285
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/09/msg00030.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.