A open redirect vulnerability exists in Action Pack >= 6.0.0 that could allow an attacker to craft a "X-Forwarded-Host" headers in combinati
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB / GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 90.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: rails (Debian:11) 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-2+deb11u1; rails (Debian:12) 2:6.1.4.6+dfsg-1; rubygem-actionpack-6.0 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 6.0.4.4-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to rails (Debian:11) 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-2+deb11u1; rails (Debian:12) 2:6.1.4.6+dfsg-1; rubygem-actionpack-6.0 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 6.0.4.4-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A open redirect vulnerability exists in Action Pack >= 6.0.0 that could allow an attacker to craft a "X-Forwarded-Host" headers in combination with certain "allowed host" formats can cause the Host Authorization middleware in Action Pack to redirect users to a malicious website.
- Published
- Jan 10, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.1% · 90th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-601
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rubyonrails | rails | cpe:2.3:a:rubyonrails:rails |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rubyonrails rails6.0.4.2
- rubyonrails rails6.1.4.2
- rubyonrails rails7.0.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hackerone). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a https://github.com/rails/rails
- 6.1.4.2, 6.0.4.2, 7.0.0.rc2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | rails | before 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-2+deb11u1 | 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-2+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | rails | before 2:6.1.4.6+dfsg-1 | 2:6.1.4.6+dfsg-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rubygem-actionpack-6.0 | before 6.0.4.4-1.1 | 6.0.4.4-1.1 |
| RubyGems | actionpack | from 6.0.0 · before 6.0.4.2 | 6.0.4.2 |
| RubyGems | actionpack | from 6.1.0 · before 6.1.4.2 | 6.1.4.2 |
Same product
rubyonrails: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-5418There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accepKEV90Now
- CVE-2016-0752Directory traversal vulnerability in Action View in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.22.1, 4.0.x and 4.1.x before 4.1.14.1, 4.2.x before 4.2.5.1, anKEV89Now
- CVE-2019-5420A remote code execution vulnerability in development mode Rails <5.2.2.1, <6.0.0.beta3 can allow an attacker to guess the automatically gene66This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-22942Oct 18, 2021 · A possible open redirect vulnerability in the Host Authorization middleware in Action Pack >= 6.0.0 that could allow attackers to redirect u25Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-1497Oct 19, 2021 · A cross-site scripting vulnerability flaw was found in the auto_link function in Rails before version 3.0.6.24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-23633Feb 11, 2022 · Exposure of sensitive information in Action Pack24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:rails | 2:6.1.4.6+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rubygem-actionpack-6.0 | 6.0.4.4-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:actionpack | 6.0.4.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:actionpack | 6.1.4.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2021-44528 | — |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-601 · URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.