CVE-2021-3690: A flaw was found in Undertow.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 78.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: undertow (Debian:14) 2.2.10-1; io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) 2.2.10, 2.0.40; eap7-activemq-artemis (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7) 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7.
- Mentioned 2 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to undertow (Debian:14) 2.2.10-1; io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) 2.2.10, 2.0.40; eap7-activemq-artemis (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7) 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability.
- Published
- Aug 23, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.7% · 78th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 1.7%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | single sign-on | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on |
| redhat | undertow | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow |
| redhat | fuse | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:fuse |
| redhat | integration camel k | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k |
| redhat | integration camel quarkus | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_quarkus |
| redhat | jboss enterprise application platform | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform |
| redhat | openshift application runtimes | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_application_runtimes |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat fuse1.0
- redhat integration camel kall versions
- redhat integration camel quarkusall versions
- redhat jboss enterprise application platformall versions
- redhat jboss enterprise application platform7.3
- redhat jboss enterprise application platform7.4
- redhat openshift application runtimesall versions
- redhat single sign-onall versions
- redhat undertowbefore 2.0.40
- redhat undertow2.1.0 and later · before 2.2.10
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a undertow
- Fixed in 2.2.10.Final, 2.0.40.Finalaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:14 | undertow | before 2.2.10-1 | 2.2.10-1 |
| Maven | io.undertow:undertow-core | from 2.2.0 · before 2.2.10 | 2.2.10 |
| Maven | io.undertow:undertow-core | before 2.0.40 | 2.0.40 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-cli | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-commons | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-core-client | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-dto | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-hornetq-protocol | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-hqclient-protocol | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-jdbc-store | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-jms-client | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-jms-server | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-journal | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-native | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-ra | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-selector | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-server | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-service-extensions | before 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-artemis-native | before 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-artemis-native-debuginfo | before 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-artemis-native-wildfly | before 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 1:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-jboss-xnio-base | before 0:3.5.11-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | 0:3.5.11-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.1::el7 | eap7-jsoup | before 0:1.14.2-1.redhat_00002.1.ep7.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.redhat_00002.1.ep7.el7 |
+96
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-14860It was found that the Syndesis configuration for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing was set to allow all origins.26Monitor
- CVE-2025-57849Fuse: privilege escalation via excessive /etc/passwd permissions25Monitor
- CVE-2020-10688A cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in RESTEasy in versions before 3.11.1.Final and before 4.5.3.Final, where it did not properly ha24Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-3597May 24, 2022 · A flaw was found in undertow.23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:undertow | 2.2.10-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:io.undertow:undertow-core | 2.0.40 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:io.undertow:undertow-core | 2.2.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-apache-commons-io | 0:2.10.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hal-console | 0:3.2.16-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hibernate | 0:5.3.20-4.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hibernate-core | 0:5.3.20-4.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hibernate-entitymanager | 0:5.3.20-4.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hibernate-envers | 0:5.3.20-4.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-hibernate-java8 | 0:5.3.20-4.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-ironjacamar | 0:1.4.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-ironjacamar-common-api | 0:1.4.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-ironjacamar-common-impl | 0:1.4.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-ironjacamar-common-spi | 0:1.4.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:eap7-undertow | 0:2.0.38-2.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el6eap · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0247 · Mar 24, 2022(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
- TR-21-0737 · Sep 15, 2021(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.