CVE-2021-33076: Improper authentication in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
- Physical access to the device is required. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper authentication in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
- Published
- Sep 20, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 23th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.8
- CNA · intel
- 5.3
- 1.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| intel | ssd 600p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_600p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 600p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_600p |
| intel | ssd 660p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_660p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 660p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_660p |
| intel | ssd 665p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_665p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 665p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_665p |
| intel | ssd 670p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_670p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 670p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_670p |
| intel | ssd 700p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_700p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 700p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_700p |
| intel | ssd 760p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:intel:ssd_760p_firmware |
| intel | ssd 760p | cpe:2.3:h:intel:ssd_760p |
and 48 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- intel ssd 600p firmwarebefore 122c
- intel ssd 660p firmwarebefore 005c
- intel ssd 665p firmwarebefore 002c
- intel ssd 670p firmwarebefore 003c
- intel ssd 700p firmwarebefore 005c
- intel ssd 760p firmwarebefore 006c
- intel ssd d3-s4510 m.2 firmwarebefore xc311132
- intel ssd d3-s4610 m.2 firmwarebefore xc311132
- intel ssd d5-p4326 firmwarebefore 8dv1md58
- intel ssd d5-p5316 firmwarebefore acv10200
- intel ssd d7 p5510 firmwarebefore jcv10200
- intel ssd d7 p5600 firmwareall versions
- intel ssd dc d4512 firmwarebefore vpv1et0k
- intel ssd dc p3100 firmwarebefore 119d
- intel ssd dc p4101 firmwarebefore 009d
- intel ssd dc p4500 firmwarebefore qdv101b1
- intel ssd dc p4501 firmwarebefore qdv101b1
- intel ssd dc p4510 edsff firmwarebefore vev10284
- intel ssd dc p4510 sff firmwarebefore vdv10184
- intel ssd dc p4511 edsff firmwarebefore vev10284
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (intel). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a Intel(R) SSD DC
- See referencesaffected
Same product
intel: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-33081Protection mechanism failure in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information dis17Monitor
- CVE-2021-33079Protection mechanism failure in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information dis17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Physical access to the device is required.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Physical
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middleware
app.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();
admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);
app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.