GateManager does not enforce strict hostname matching for WEB server
This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.6. Improper Check of host header in web server of Secomea GateManager allows attacker to cause browser cache poisoning.
- Published
- Nov 22, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 49th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-923
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · Secomea
- 3.7
- 1.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| secomea | gatemanager 8250 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secomea:gatemanager_8250_firmware |
| secomea | gatemanager 8250 | cpe:2.3:h:secomea:gatemanager_8250 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- secomea gatemanager 8250 firmwarebefore 9.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Secomea). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Secomea GateManager
- All and later · before 9.6affected
Same product
secomea: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-14510OFF-BY-ONE ERROR CWE-19340Plan
- CVE-2020-14508OFF-BY-ONE ERROR CWE-19340Plan
- CVE-2020-14500IMPROPER NEUTRALIZATION OF NULL BYTE OR NUL CHARACTER CWE-15839Monitor
- CVE-2020-29031Insecure Direct Object Reference in GateManager WebUI can cause privilege escalation32Monitor
- CVE-2020-14512USE OF PASSWORD HASH WITH INSUFFICIENT COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT CWE-91630Monitor
- CVE-2020-29032Add integrity check of GateManager firmware28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-923 · Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended EndpointsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.