CVE-2021-31411: Insecure temporary directory usage in frontend build functionality of Vaadin 14 and 15-19
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Vaadin flow-server 6.0.0; Vaadin Vaadin 19.0.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Vaadin flow-server 6.0.0; Vaadin Vaadin 19.0.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Insecure temporary directory usage in frontend build functionality of com.vaadin:flow-server versions 2.0.9 through 2.5.2 (Vaadin 14.0.3 through Vaadin 14.5.2), 3.0 prior to 6.0 (Vaadin 15 prior to 19), and 6.0.0 through 6.0.5 (Vaadin 19.0.0 through 19.0.4) allows local users to inject malicious code into frontend resources during application rebuilds.
- Published
- May 5, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-379
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · Vaadin
- 6.3
- 1.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- vaadin flow2.0.9 and later · before 2.5.3
- vaadin flow3.0.0 and later · up to 5.0.0 inclusive
- vaadin flow6.0.0 and later · up to 6.0.6 inclusive
- vaadin vaadin14.0.3 and later · before 14.5.3
- vaadin vaadin15.0.0 and later · before 19.0.5
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Vaadin). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Vaadin flow-server
- 2.0.9 and lateraffectedfixed in 6.0.0
Vaadin Vaadin
- 14.0.3 and lateraffectedfixed in 19.0.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | com.vaadin:vaadin-bom | from 14.0.3 · before 14.5.3 | 14.5.3 |
| Maven | com.vaadin:vaadin-bom | from 15.0.0 · before 19.0.5 | 19.0.5 |
Same product
vaadin: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-31407Server classes and resources exposure in OSGi applications using Vaadin 12-14 and 1931Monitor
- CVE-2021-31405Regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) in EmailField component in Vaadin 14 and 15-1730Monitor
- CVE-2020-36321Directory traversal in development mode handler in Vaadin 14 and 15-1730Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-31406Apr 23, 2021 · Timing side channel vulnerability in endpoint request handler in Vaadin 15-1910Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-31408Apr 23, 2021 · Server session is not invalidated when logout() helper method of Authentication module is used in Vaadin 18-1928Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-31412Jun 24, 2021 · Possible route enumeration in production mode via RouteNotFoundError view in Vaadin 10, 11-14, and 15-1921Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Vaadin flow-server | 6.0.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Vaadin Vaadin | 19.0.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Maven:com.vaadin:vaadin-bom | 14.5.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:com.vaadin:vaadin-bom | 19.0.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-379 · Creation of Temporary File in Directory with Insecure PermissionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.