CVE-2021-29512: Heap buffer overflow in `RaggedBinCount`
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: tensorflow (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2; tensorflow-cpu (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2; tensorflow-gpu (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 2.5, NVD 7.8.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to tensorflow (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2; tensorflow-cpu (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2; tensorflow-gpu (PyPI) 2.3.3, 2.4.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. If the `splits` argument of `RaggedBincount` does not specify a valid `SparseTensor`(https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/sparse/SparseTensor), then an attacker can trigger a heap buffer overflow. This will cause a read from outside the bounds of the `splits` tensor buffer in the implementation of the `RaggedBincount` op(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/8b677d79167799f71c42fd3fa074476e0295413a/tensorflow/core/kernels/bincount_op.cc#L430-L433). Before the `for` loop, `batch_idx` is set to 0. The user controls the `splits` array, making it contain only one element, 0. Thus, the code in the `while` loop would increment `batch_idx` and then try to read `splits(1)`, which is outside of bounds. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2 and TensorFlow 2.3.3, as these are also affected.
- Published
- May 14, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 11th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 2.5
- 5.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| tensorflow | cpe:2.3:a:google:tensorflow |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
tensorflow tensorflow
- >=2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- google tensorflow2.3.0 and later · before 2.3.3
- google tensorflow2.4.0 and later · before 2.4.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | tensorflow | from 2.3.0 · before 2.3.3 | 2.3.3 |
| PyPI | tensorflow | from 2.4.0 · before 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
| PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | from 2.3.0 · before 2.3.3 | 2.3.3 |
| PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | from 2.4.0 · before 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
| PyPI | tensorflow-gpu | from 2.3.0 · before 2.3.3 | 2.3.3 |
| PyPI | tensorflow-gpu | from 2.4.0 · before 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
Same product
google: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-25668TensorFlow vulnerable to heap out-of-buffer read in the QuantizeAndDequantize operation39Monitor
- CVE-2023-25664TensorFlow vulnerable to Heap Buffer Overflow in AvgPoolGrad39Monitor
- CVE-2022-41900FractionalMaxPool and FractionalAVGPool heap out-of-bounds acess in Tensorflow39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-26269Dec 10, 2020 · Heap out of bounds read in filesystem glob matching in TensorFlow30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-26270Dec 10, 2020 · CHECK-fail in LSTM with zero-length input in TensorFlow13Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-29554May 14, 2021 · Division by 0 in `DenseCountSparseOutput`22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PyPI:tensorflow | 2.3.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:tensorflow | 2.4.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:tensorflow-cpu | 2.3.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:tensorflow-cpu | 2.4.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:tensorflow-gpu | 2.3.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:tensorflow-gpu | 2.4.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-21-0701 · Sep 3, 2021(IBM Güvenlik Bülteni Yayınladı)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.