CVE-2021-29447: WordPress Authenticated XXE attack when installation is running PHP 8
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 52/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB, GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 85.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: wordpress (Debian:10) 5.0.12+dfsg1-0+deb10u1; wordpress (Debian:12) 5.7.1+dfsg1-1; wordpress (Debian:9) 4.7.20+dfsg-1+deb9u1.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to wordpress (Debian:10) 5.0.12+dfsg1-0+deb10u1; wordpress (Debian:12) 5.7.1+dfsg1-1; wordpress (Debian:9) 4.7.20+dfsg-1+deb9u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Wordpress is an open source CMS. A user with the ability to upload files (like an Author) can exploit an XML parsing issue in the Media Library leading to XXE attacks. This requires WordPress installation to be using PHP 8. Access to internal files is possible in a successful XXE attack. This has been patched in WordPress version 5.7.1, along with the older affected versions via a minor release. We strongly recommend you keep auto-updates enabled.
- Published
- Apr 15, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 85.7% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-611
Report tools
Action score
52
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 26 / 30 · 85.7%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.1
- 0.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Is WordPress on your site?
WP Lens reads your site's plugin, theme and WordPress versions from the outside and matches them to known vulnerabilities. Works without an account.
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| wordpress | wordpress | cpe:2.3:a:wordpress:wordpress |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
Using wordpress? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (WordPress)
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- wordpress wordpress5.6.0 and later · before 5.7.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
WordPress wordpress-develop
- >= 5.6.0, < 5.7.1affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | wordpress | before 5.0.12+dfsg1-0+deb10u1 | 5.0.12+dfsg1-0+deb10u1 |
| Debian:12 | wordpress | before 5.7.1+dfsg1-1 | 5.7.1+dfsg1-1 |
| Debian:9 | wordpress | before 4.7.20+dfsg-1+deb9u1 | 4.7.20+dfsg-1+deb9u1 |
Same product
wordpress: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-87902An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the KEV91Now
- CVE-2026-63030WordPress < 7.0.2 - REST API batch-route confusion and SQL injection issue leading to Remote Code ExecutionKEV72This week
- CVE-2026-60137WordPress < 7.0.2 - Facilitated SQL Injection via author__not_in in WP_QueryKEV60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-28039Nov 2, 2020 · is_protected_meta in wp-includes/meta.php in WordPress before 5.5.2 allows arbitrary file deletion because it does not properly determine wh37Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-28040Nov 2, 2020 · WordPress before 5.5.2 allows CSRF attacks that change a theme's background image.17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-29450Apr 15, 2021 · WordPress Authenticated disclosure of password-protected posts and pages18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:wordpress | 5.7.1+dfsg1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×24
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2021-09-20 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:44 | 2021-04-16 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:4 | 2021-05-23 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2021-06-01 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2021-08-27 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2022-11-05 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2022-11-06 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2022-11-06 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:4 | 2022-11-11 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:7 | 2022-11-14 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2022-11-15 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2022-11-17 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoCsame day
- TodayNov 1, 2026+2026 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-611 · Improper Restriction of XML External Entity ReferenceCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.