CVE-2021-29073: Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an authenticated user.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.35% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an authenticated user. This affects R8000P before 1.4.1.66, MK62 before 1.0.6.110, MR60 before 1.0.6.110, MS60 before 1.0.6.110, R7960P before 1.4.1.66, R7900P before 1.4.1.66, RAX15 before 1.0.2.82, RAX20 before 1.0.2.82, RAX45 before 1.0.2.72, RAX50 before 1.0.2.72, RAX75 before 1.0.3.106, RAX80 before 1.0.3.106, and RAX200 before 1.0.3.106.
- Published
- Mar 23, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 29th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-787
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 33 / 40 · 8.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.4
- CNA · mitre
- 7.6
- 0.8 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AC:H/AV:A/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:H/S:C/UI:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | r8000p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r8000p_firmware |
| netgear | r8000p | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r8000p |
| netgear | mk62 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:mk62_firmware |
| netgear | mk62 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:mk62 |
| netgear | mr60 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:mr60_firmware |
| netgear | mr60 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:mr60 |
| netgear | ms60 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:ms60_firmware |
| netgear | ms60 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:ms60 |
| netgear | r7960p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r7960p_firmware |
| netgear | r7960p | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r7960p |
| netgear | r7900p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r7900p_firmware |
| netgear | r7900p | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r7900p |
and 14 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear mk62 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.110
- netgear mr60 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.110
- netgear ms60 firmwarebefore 1.0.6.110
- netgear r7900p firmwarebefore 1.4.1.66
- netgear r7960p firmwarebefore 1.4.1.66
- netgear r8000p firmwarebefore 1.4.1.66
- netgear rax15 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.82
- netgear rax20 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.82
- netgear rax200 firmwarebefore 1.0.3.106
- netgear rax45 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.72
- netgear rax50 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.72
- netgear rax75 firmwarebefore 1.0.3.106
- netgear rax80 firmwarebefore 1.0.3.106
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.