Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2021-21295: Possible request smuggling in HTTP/2 due missing validation

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 18.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.3% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: netty io.netty:netty-codec-http2 4.1.60.Final.
  • Mentioned 2 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Upgrade to netty io.netty:netty-codec-http2 4.1.60.Final or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty (io.netty:netty-codec-http2) before version 4.1.60.Final there is a vulnerability that enables request smuggling. If a Content-Length header is present in the original HTTP/2 request, the field is not validated by `Http2MultiplexHandler` as it is propagated up. This is fine as long as the request is not proxied through as HTTP/1.1. If the request comes in as an HTTP/2 stream, gets converted into the HTTP/1.1 domain objects (`HttpRequest`, `HttpContent`, etc.) via `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec `and then sent up to the child channel's pipeline and proxied through a remote peer as HTTP/1.1 this may result in request smuggling. In a proxy case, users may assume the content-length is validated somehow, which is not the case. If the request is forwarded to a backend channel that is a HTTP/1.1 connection, the Content-Length now has meaning and needs to be checked. An attacker can smuggle requests inside the body as it gets downgraded from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1. For an example attack refer to the linked GitHub Advisory. Users are only affected if all of this is true: `HTTP2MultiplexCodec` or `Http2FrameCodec` is used, `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec` is used to convert to HTTP/1.1 objects, and these HTTP/1.1 objects are forwarded to another remote peer. This has been patched in 4.1.60.Final As a workaround, the user can do the validation by themselves by implementing a custom `ChannelInboundHandler` that is put in the `ChannelPipeline` behind `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec`.

MediumCVSS 5.9 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 9, 2021
Updated
Oct 8, 2026
EPSS
18.8% · 97th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

29

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
23 / 40 · 5.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
6 / 30 · 18.8%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
5.9
CNA · GitHub_M
5.9
agree

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2021-21295

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
nettynetty
netapponcommand api services
netapponcommand workflow automation
debiandebian linux
quarkusquarkus
apachekudu
apachezookeeper
oraclecommunications cloud native core policy

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • apache kudubefore 1.16.0
  • apache zookeeper3.5.9
  • debian debian linux10.0
  • netapp oncommand api servicesall versions
  • netapp oncommand workflow automationall versions
  • netty nettybefore 4.1.60
  • oracle communications cloud native core policy1.14.0
  • quarkus quarkusup to 1.13.7 inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • netty io.netty:netty-codec-http2

    • < 4.1.60.Finalaffected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:10nettybefore 1:4.1.33-1+deb10u21:4.1.33-1+deb10u2
Debian:12nettybefore 1:4.1.48-31:4.1.48-3
Mavenio.netty:nettyfrom 0—
Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http2from 4.0.0 · before 4.1.60.Final4.1.60.Final
Mavenorg.jboss.netty:nettyfrom 0—
openSUSE:Leap 15.2nettybefore 4.1.13-lp152.3.3.14.1.13-lp152.3.3.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.3nettybefore 4.1.75-150200.4.6.24.1.75-150200.4.6.2
openSUSE:Tumbleweednettybefore 4.1.60-1.44.1.60-1.4
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7python-qpid-protonbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7python-qpid-proton-docsbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-protonbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-cbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-c-develbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-c-docsbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-cppbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-cpp-develbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-cpp-docsbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-debuginfobefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7qpid-proton-testsbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7rubygem-qpid_protonbefore 0:0.33.0-6.el7_90:0.33.0-6.el7_9
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el8python-qpid-proton-docsbefore 0:0.33.0-8.el80:0.33.0-8.el8
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el8python3-qpid-protonbefore 0:0.33.0-8.el80:0.33.0-8.el8
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el8python3-qpid-proton-debuginfobefore 0:0.33.0-8.el80:0.33.0-8.el8
Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el8qpid-protonbefore 0:0.33.0-8.el80:0.33.0-8.el8

+96

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-47691Netty has Insufficient Bailiwick Validation for NS Records
    40Plan
  • CVE-2026-45674Netty Vulnerable to DNS Cache Poisoning via Missing Bailiwick Checks in CNAME Records
    40Plan
  • CVE-2019-20445HttpObjectDecoder.java in Netty before 4.1.44 allows a Content-Length header to be accompanied by a second Content-Length header, or by a Tr
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2020-11612Apr 7, 2020 · The ZlibDecoders in Netty 4.1.x before 4.1.46 allow for unbounded memory allocation while decoding a ZlibEncoded byte stream.
    33Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2021-21290Feb 8, 2021 · Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability in Netty on Unix-Like systems due temporary files
    23Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2021-21409Mar 30, 2021 · Possible request smuggling in HTTP/2 due missing validation of content-length
    24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
netty io.netty:netty-codec-http24.1.60.Final · descriptionVendor (CNA)
debian:netty1:4.1.48-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
Maven:io.netty:netty-codec-http24.1.60.FinalPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:netty4.1.75-150200.4.6.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python-qpid-proton0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python-qpid-proton-docs0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-c0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-c-devel0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-c-docs0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-cpp0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-cpp-devel0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-cpp-docs0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-debuginfo0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:qpid-proton-tests0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-qpid_proton0:0.33.0-6.el7_9 · Red Hat:a_mq_clients:2::el7Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:libdb0:5.3.28-42.el8_4 · Rocky Linux:8Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. SSVC exploitation— → none
  2. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (19 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records