CVE-2021-1950: Improper cleaning of secure memory between authenticated users can lead to face authentication bypass in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.15% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper cleaning of secure memory between authenticated users can lead to face authentication bypass in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking
- Published
- Apr 1, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 4th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · qualcomm
- 7.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| qualcomm | ar8035 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:ar8035_firmware |
| qualcomm | ar8035 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:ar8035 |
| qualcomm | csr8811 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:csr8811_firmware |
| qualcomm | csr8811 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:csr8811 |
| qualcomm | ipq6000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:ipq6000_firmware |
| qualcomm | ipq6000 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:ipq6000 |
| qualcomm | ipq6005 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:ipq6005_firmware |
| qualcomm | ipq6005 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:ipq6005 |
| qualcomm | ipq6010 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:ipq6010_firmware |
| qualcomm | ipq6010 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:ipq6010 |
| qualcomm | ipq6018 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:ipq6018_firmware |
| qualcomm | ipq6018 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:ipq6018 |
and 172 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- qualcomm ar8035 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm csr8811 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm ipq6000 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm ipq6005 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm ipq6010 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm ipq6018 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm ipq6028 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca4024 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6390 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6391 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6426 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6436 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6574au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6696 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca8072 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca8075 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca8081 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca9984 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qcm2290 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qcm4290 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (qualcomm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking
- AR8035, CSR8811, IPQ6000, IPQ6005, IPQ6010, IPQ6018, IPQ6028, QCA4024, QCA6390, QCA6391, QCA6426, QCA6436, QCA6574AU, QCA6696, QCA8072, QCA8075, QCA8081, QCA9984, QCM2290, QCM4290, QCM6490, QCN5021, Qaffected
Same product
qualcomm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-33106Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GraphicsKEV61This week
- CVE-2024-49839Buffer Over-read in WLAN Host Cmn39Monitor
- CVE-2024-45569Improper Validation of Array Index in WLAN Host Communication39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-35075Feb 11, 2022 · Possible null pointer dereference due to lack of WDOG structure validation during registration in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Connectivity, 31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-35077Feb 11, 2022 · Possible use after free scenario in compute offloads to DSP while multiple calls spawn a dynamic process in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Comp31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-30328Apr 1, 2022 · Possible assertion due to improper validation of invalid NR CSI-IM resource configuration in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2021-3509574 days apartImproper serialization of message queue client registration can lead to race condition allowing multiple gunyah message clients to register 28Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middleware
app.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();
admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);
app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.