Cisco HyperFlex HX Command Injection Vulnerabilities
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex HX could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
- Published
- May 6, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 100.0% · 100th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
99
Now
Patch today or shut off access.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 30 / 30 · Listed
- EPSS
- 30 / 30 · 100.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- active
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · cisco
- 9.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Actively exploited in the wild
CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Nov 3, 2021. That signals real attacks, not theory.
Remediation deadline for government agencies: Nov 17, 2021.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | hyperflex hx data platform | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform |
| cisco | hyperflex hx220c af m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx220c_af_m5 |
| cisco | hyperflex hx220c all nvme m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx220c_all_nvme_m5 |
| cisco | hyperflex hx220c edge m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx220c_edge_m5 |
| cisco | hyperflex hx220c m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx220c_m5 |
| cisco | hyperflex hx240c | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx240c |
| cisco | hyperflex hx240c af m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx240c_af_m5 |
| cisco | hyperflex hx240c m5 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:hyperflex_hx240c_m5 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco hyperflex hx data platformbefore 4.0\(2e\)
- cisco hyperflex hx data platform4.5 and later · before 4.5\(2a\)
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco HyperFlex HX Data Platform
- n/aaffected
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-1497Cisco HyperFlex HX Command Injection VulnerabilitiesKEV99Now
- CVE-2021-1499Cisco HyperFlex HX Data Platform File Upload Vulnerability45Plan
- CVE-2019-1958Cisco HyperFlex Software Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability35Monitor
- CVE-2018-15380Cisco HyperFlex Software Command Injection Vulnerability35Monitor
- CVE-2018-15382Cisco HyperFlex Software Static Signing Key Vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2019-1664Cisco HyperFlex Software Unauthenticated Root Access Vulnerability31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
- Nuclei detection template ×2
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Metasploit module | exploit/linux/http/cisco_hyperflex_hx_data_platform_cmd_execCisco HyperFlex HX Data Platform Command Executionexploit | 2021-05-05 |
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2021-1497 | — |
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2021-1498 | — |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploit-1 d
- Published
- CISA KEV+181 d
- TodaySep 29, 2026+1973 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-hyperflex-rce-TjjNrkpR
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-1498
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.