CVE-2020-9081: There is an improper authorization vulnerability in some Huawei smartphones.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Physical access to the device is required. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 3.5, NVD 6.8.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
There is an improper authorization vulnerability in some Huawei smartphones. An attacker could perform a series of operation in specific mode to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass app lock. (Vulnerability ID: HWPSIRT-2019-12144) This vulnerability has been assigned a Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) ID: CVE-2020-9081.
- Published
- Dec 27, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 10th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-285
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.8
- CNA · huawei
- 3.5
- 3.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| huawei | mate 20 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:mate_20_firmware |
| huawei | mate 20 | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:mate_20 |
| huawei | p30 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:p30_firmware |
| huawei | p30 | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:p30 |
| huawei | p30 pro firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:p30_pro_firmware |
| huawei | p30 pro | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:p30_pro |
| huawei | princeton-al10d firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:princeton-al10d_firmware |
| huawei | princeton-al10d | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:princeton-al10d |
| huawei | yale-al00a firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:yale-al00a_firmware |
| huawei | yale-al00a | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:yale-al00a |
| huawei | yale-al50a firmware | cpe:2.3:o:huawei:yale-al50a_firmware |
| huawei | yale-al50a | cpe:2.3:h:huawei:yale-al50a |
and 2 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- huawei mate 20 firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r3p8\)
- huawei mate 20 firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c01e160r2p8\)
- huawei p30 firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)
- huawei p30 pro firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c01e160r2p8\)
- huawei p30 pro firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p8\)
- huawei princeton-al10d firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)
- huawei yale-al00a firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r8p12\)
- huawei yale-al50a firmwarebefore 10.1.0.88\(c00e88r8p1\)
- huawei yalep-al10b firmwarebefore 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r8p12\)
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (huawei). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Huawei HUAWEI Mate 20
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R3P8), Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C01E160R2P8)affected
Huawei HUAWEI P30
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11)affected
Huawei HUAWEI P30 Pro
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P8), Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C01E160R2P8)affected
Huawei Princeton-AL10D
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11)affected
Huawei Yale-AL00A
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R8P12)affected
Huawei Yale-AL50A
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.88(C00E88R8P1)affected
Huawei YaleP-AL10B
- Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R8P12)affected
Same product
huawei: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-9113HUAWEI Mate 20 versions earlier than 10.0.0.188(C00E74R3P8) have a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Bluetooth module.32Monitor
- CVE-2020-9244HUAWEI Mate 20 versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R3P8);HUAWEI Mate 20 Pro versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.270(C431E7R1P27Monitor
- CVE-2020-1796There is an improper authorization vulnerability in several smartphones.26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-9092Oct 19, 2020 · HUAWEI Mate 20 versions earlier than 10.1.0.163(C00E160R3P8) have a JavaScript injection vulnerability.18Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-22440Jul 13, 2021 · There is a path traversal vulnerability in some Huawei products.18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-9082Dec 27, 2024 · There is an information disclosure vulnerability in several smartphones.18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Physical access to the device is required.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Physical
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-285 · Improper AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data TokensCAPEC-39likelihood: High · Medium
- Bypassing ATA Password SecurityCAPEC-402
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Data from Local SystemT1005
- Query RegistryT1012
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in RegistryT1552.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data ManipulationT1565.002
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.