Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2020-9076· NVD / CVE Program· CNA huawei

HUAWEI P30;HUAWEI P30 Pro;Tony-AL00B smartphones with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11); versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E1

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.59% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

HUAWEI P30;HUAWEI P30 Pro;Tony-AL00B smartphones with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11); versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P8), versions earlier than 10.1.0.135 have an improper authentication vulnerability. Due to the identity of the message sender not being properly verified, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability through man-in-the-middle attack to induce user to access malicious URL.

MediumCVSS 6.8 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Jun 15, 2020
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 48th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

27

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2020-9076

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for huawei records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
huaweip30 firmware
huaweip30
huaweip30 pro firmware
huaweip30 pro
huaweitony-al00b firmware
huaweitony-al00b

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • huawei p30 firmwarebefore 10.1.0.135\(c00e135r2p11\)
  • huawei p30 pro firmwarebefore 10.1.0.135\(c00e135r2p8\)
  • huawei p30 pro firmwarebefore 10.1.0.135\(c01e135r2p8\)
  • huawei tony-al00b firmwarebefore 10.1.0.137\(c00e137r2p11\)

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (huawei). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • n/a HUAWEI P30;HUAWEI P30 Pro;Tony-AL00B

    • Versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11), Versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P8),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C01E135R2P8), Versions earlier than 10.1.0.137(C00E137R2P11)affected

Same product

huawei: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2020-1800HUAWEI smartphones P30 with versions earlier than 10.0.0.185(C00E85R1P11) have an improper access control vulnerability.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2020-1812HUAWEI P30 smartphones with versions earlier than 10.0.0.173(C00E73R1P11) have an improper authentication vulnerability.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2019-5225P30, Mate 20, P30 Pro smartphones with software of versions earlier than ELLE-AL00B 9.1.0.193(C00E190R1P21), versions earlier than Hima-AL00
    31Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2020-1798May 29, 2020 · HUAWEI P30 smartphones with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper authentication vulnerability.
    18Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2020-1813Jun 15, 2020 · HUAWEI P30 smart phone with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper authentication vulnerability.
    27Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2020-1834Jun 18, 2020 · HUAWEI P30 and HUAWEI P30 Pro with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) and versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P8) have an
    18Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-287 · Improper Authentication

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

nvd-primary

Root cause

Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-287 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middlewareapp.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);

Fixed

ts
const admin = express.Router();admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);app.use("/admin", admin);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records