CVE-2020-3560: Cisco Aironet Access Points UDP Flooding Denial of Service Vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 72.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability in Cisco Aironet Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper resource management while processing specific packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of crafted UDP packets to a specific port on an affected device. A successful exploit could either allow the attacker to tear down the connection between the AP and the wireless LAN controller, resulting in the affected device not being able to process client traffic, or cause the vulnerable device to reload, triggering a DoS condition. After the attack, the affected device should automatically recover its normal functions without manual intervention.
- Published
- Sep 24, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 72th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.6
- CNA · cisco
- 8.6
- agree
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | wireless lan controller | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wireless_lan_controller |
| cisco | wireless lan controller software | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wireless_lan_controller_software |
| cisco | 1111-4pwe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1111-4pwe |
| cisco | 1111-8plteeawb | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1111-8plteeawb |
| cisco | 1111-8pwb | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1111-8pwb |
| cisco | 1113-8plteeawe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1113-8plteeawe |
| cisco | 1113-8pmwe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1113-8pmwe |
| cisco | 1113-8pwe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1113-8pwe |
| cisco | 1116-4plteeawe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1116-4plteeawe |
| cisco | 1116-4pwe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1116-4pwe |
| cisco | 1117-4plteeawe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1117-4plteeawe |
| cisco | 1117-4pmlteeawe | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:1117-4pmlteeawe |
and 37 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco access pointsbefore 16.12.4a
- cisco aironet access point software17.1.2.6
- cisco aironet access point software17.1.2.9
- cisco aironet access point software17.2.0.37
- cisco aironet access point software8.10(105.0)
- cisco aironet access point software8.10(105.4)
- cisco aironet access point software8.5(154.27)
- cisco aironet access point software8.8(125.0)
- cisco business access points10.0 and later · before 10.1.1.0
- cisco wireless lan controller8.9 and later · before 8.10.112.0
- cisco wireless lan controller software8.6 and later · before 8.8.130.0
- cisco wireless lan controller softwarebefore 8.5.161.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco Aironet Access Point Software
- n/aaffected
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-3559Cisco Aironet Access Point Authentication Flood Denial of Service Vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2020-3552Cisco Aironet Access Points Ethernet Wired Clients Denial of Service Vulnerability29Monitor
- CVE-2015-0622The Wireless Intrusion Detection (aka WIDS) functionality on Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices allows remote attackers to cause a 28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-1796Apr 17, 2019 · Cisco Wireless LAN Controller Software IAPP Message Handling Denial of Service Vulnerabilities26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-1799Apr 17, 2019 · Cisco Wireless LAN Controller Software IAPP Message Handling Denial of Service Vulnerabilities26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-1800Apr 17, 2019 · Cisco Wireless LAN Controller Software IAPP Message Handling Denial of Service Vulnerabilities26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.